2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized individual semantics based on consistency in hesitant linguistic group decision making with comparative linguistic expressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is valuable to develop effective semantic assignment methods as the future research according to practical situations. Some techniques such as granular computing and particle swarm optimization (Cabrerizo, Herrera‐Viedma, & Pedrycz, ) and consistency‐based personalized individual semantics (Li, Dong, & Herrera, ; Li, Rodríguez, et al, ) can be used in the future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is valuable to develop effective semantic assignment methods as the future research according to practical situations. Some techniques such as granular computing and particle swarm optimization (Cabrerizo, Herrera‐Viedma, & Pedrycz, ) and consistency‐based personalized individual semantics (Li, Dong, & Herrera, ; Li, Rodríguez, et al, ) can be used in the future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group consensus is one of the most important issues in GDM, which indicates the agreement among assessments provided by all individual DMs (Li, Rodríguez, et al, ; Li, Wang, & Hu, ; Palomares et al, ; Wu et al, ; Zhang, Dong, Chiclana, & Yu, ). The low group consensus level would result in unreasonable solution (Wan, Wang, & Dong, ).…”
Section: The Proposed Framework For Qfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, many approaches have been proposed to discuss the consistency of different kinds of preference relations . For instance, Dong et al proposed a consistency for linguistic preference relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, many approaches have been proposed to discuss the consistency of different kinds of preference relations. 2,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] For instance, Dong et al 21 proposed a consistency for linguistic preference relations. Herrera-Viedma et al 19 presented a study of the consistency for fuzzy preference relations (FPRs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu and Xu [39] proposed a large-scale group decision-making consensus model with possibility distribution based hesitant fuzzy preference. Li et al [40] personalized individual semantics in group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets by consensus model. Zhang et al [41] defined three kinds of additive consistency indices to measure the consistency level of hesitant fuzzy preference relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%