2021
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Chest Computed Tomography

Abstract: Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum diagnostic radiation dose level for the detection of high-resolution (HR) lung structures, pulmonary nodules (PNs), and infectious diseases (IDs). Materials and Methods A preclinical chest computed tomography (CT) trial was performed with a human cadaver without known lung disease with incremental radiation dose using tin filter-based spectral shaping protocols. A subset of protocols for full diagnostic ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, LDCT techniques have been successfully applied to many pediatric and adult populations for various clinical indications 36–42 . The newest CT dose reduction technology is based on photon counting, which has been gaining popularity and is being introduced into the clinical arena by simultaneously touting the additional advantages of high spatial resolution and high contrast-to-noise ratio 43–47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, LDCT techniques have been successfully applied to many pediatric and adult populations for various clinical indications 36–42 . The newest CT dose reduction technology is based on photon counting, which has been gaining popularity and is being introduced into the clinical arena by simultaneously touting the additional advantages of high spatial resolution and high contrast-to-noise ratio 43–47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, LDCT techniques have been successfully applied to many pediatric and adult populations for various clinical indications. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] The newest CT dose reduction technology is based on photon counting, which has been gaining popularity and is being introduced into the clinical arena by simultaneously touting the additional advantages of high spatial resolution and high contrast-to-noise ratio. [43][44][45][46][47] Thus, a potential future line of inquiry would be to investigate the use of photon counting CT for imaging hip surveillance in children with CP, with the hopes of further lowering the radiation exposure to a level comparable to radiography while providing important 3D anatomical details of the hips for diagnosis and presurgical planning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be illustrated in the field of ILDs whose depiction, pretherapeutic evaluation, and follow-up are situations often associated with high radiation dose examinations. In a study investigating personalized chest CT tailored to the clinical situation, May et al 33 showed that the evaluation of fibrotic changes and other subtle interstitial lesions was reserved for HRCT protocols, with >2 mSv effective radiation dose when obtained with a modern single-source CT scanner. Using the chest CT categories recently described by Taekker et al 34 comprises ultra-low-dose (ie, 0.22 ± 0.05 mSv), low-dose (ie, 1.22 ± 0.34 mSv), and standard dose (ie, 3.17 ± 1.47 mSv), an adequate HRCT evaluation of ILDs is currently obtained with a “standard” radiation dose.…”
Section: Low-dose Uhrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because cigarette smoking is a common risk factor for both lung cancer and COPD, evaluation of pulmonary emphysema in screening LDCT may enhance the value of lung cancer screening with LDCT. However, image noise in screening LDCTs may hamper the quantitative evaluation of pulmonary emphysema, especially because they are commonly reconstructed using high-frequency algorithms to assess small lung nodules 11–13 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, image noise in screening LDCTs may hamper the quantitative evaluation of pulmonary emphysema, especially because they are commonly reconstructed using high-frequency algorithms to assess small lung nodules. [11][12][13] The quantification of emphysema is vulnerable to variations in CT scanner, radiation dose, slice thickness, and reconstruction filter, making it a critical issue, especially for retrospective multicenter studies, as it is impossible to standardize scan parameters. To address this issue, Gallardo-Estrella et al 7 proposed kernel normalization for emphysema quantification, using 183 SDCTs (120 kVp tube energy, 200 mAs effective dose) with 5 different scanners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%