2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3020335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Adaptive Cruise Control Based on Online Driving Style Recognition Technology and Model Predictive Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], the authors take into account the characteristics of wireless communication links, such as the sampling delays, and present a network-aware CACC approach. In other works [15]- [24], researchers have designed a variety of ACC/CACC control solutions by combining different mechanisms, such as multi-modeling [15], driving style recognition [16], direct yaw moment control [17], acceleration/control feedforward [18], linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [19], and information-delay compensation mechanisms [20]- [24]. Additionally, some researchers incorporate parametric uncertainties into the vehicle dynamics and aim to design robust linear feedback controllers for vehicle platooning by leveraging the classical Kharitonov theorem and the Hurwitz criterion [28].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [14], the authors take into account the characteristics of wireless communication links, such as the sampling delays, and present a network-aware CACC approach. In other works [15]- [24], researchers have designed a variety of ACC/CACC control solutions by combining different mechanisms, such as multi-modeling [15], driving style recognition [16], direct yaw moment control [17], acceleration/control feedforward [18], linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [19], and information-delay compensation mechanisms [20]- [24]. Additionally, some researchers incorporate parametric uncertainties into the vehicle dynamics and aim to design robust linear feedback controllers for vehicle platooning by leveraging the classical Kharitonov theorem and the Hurwitz criterion [28].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal control can be further divided into two categories, model predictive control and rolling horizon control, according to the time horizon for control implementation. In fact, many researchers have leveraged model predictive control (MPC) technique to develop platoon-oriented ACC and CACC controllers like the aforementioned works [11], [13], [16], [17]. In [46], the authors propose a distributed MPC platoon control approach by considering unidirectional topologies.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aljaafreh et al [19] and Chen and Chen [20] selected acceleration and speed of the FV as characteristics to identify driving style, while Li et al [15] chose acceleration and time headway. Gao et al [21] used a group of variables, e.g., relative speed, time headway, and jerk, to reflect the differences in driving styles. Sun et al [22] utilized inter-vehicle distance, speed, and acceleration/deceleration as car-following variables to analyze driving style.…”
Section: Driving Style Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the analytical solution of the problem, the MPC optimization problem needs to be transformed into a constrained quadratic program [29], as shown in the following formula:…”
Section: Problem Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%