2023
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2021.3071434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Activity Recognition Using Partially Available Target Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Representative results include: Literature. [16] studied the evaluation method of microblog community influence, proposed an index system based on microblog information dissemination mechanism, combined quantitative indicators and qualitative indicators, and used principal component analysis to connect these the indicators combined into several comprehensive hands, which simplifies the indicator system; Literature [17] proposed a community impact evaluation model framework from the perspective of information dissemination and a set of related definitions of community impact evaluation forms, involving user impact and community impact; Literature [18] proposed a variable influence community detection method based on PageRank, which can adjust the community where a specific node is located and increase its influence. However, for the target community discovery task, in addition to accurately mining the community composed of high-quality nodes similar to the sample nodes given by the user, the ability of the community to spread the internal information of the community to external users, that is, the external influence of the community is also a significant factor.…”
Section: Quantification Methods Of Community External Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Representative results include: Literature. [16] studied the evaluation method of microblog community influence, proposed an index system based on microblog information dissemination mechanism, combined quantitative indicators and qualitative indicators, and used principal component analysis to connect these the indicators combined into several comprehensive hands, which simplifies the indicator system; Literature [17] proposed a community impact evaluation model framework from the perspective of information dissemination and a set of related definitions of community impact evaluation forms, involving user impact and community impact; Literature [18] proposed a variable influence community detection method based on PageRank, which can adjust the community where a specific node is located and increase its influence. However, for the target community discovery task, in addition to accurately mining the community composed of high-quality nodes similar to the sample nodes given by the user, the ability of the community to spread the internal information of the community to external users, that is, the external influence of the community is also a significant factor.…”
Section: Quantification Methods Of Community External Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the target subspace set obtained by the remaining maximum k-cluster mining, according to the characteristics that there may be no connection relationship between different nodes, but the attributes may be similar, based on the initial point selection strategy in the improved k-medoid algorithm [17] select the one with the most significant difference d, k-groups are used as the core of each potential target community. Specifically, given the user-related maximal k-cluster set Ĉk…”
Section: Mining K-group Pruning Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem 2 can be viewed as a combinatorial optimization problem that finds an optimal mapping in a two-tier fashion: (i) it initially performs component-level mappings where vertex-wise and edge-wise mappings are found between source and target dependency graphs; and (ii) it then uses the component-level mappings to reach a consensus about the optimal mapping for the problem as a whole. Such a two-level mapping problem can be represented using the objective in (15).…”
Section: Optimal Label Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, M is a normalization factor that is equal to the total number of component-wise mappings. The objective in (15) attempts to minimize the amount of mapping costs at the graph-level and, therefore, can be viewed as the objective for Problem 2.…”
Section: Optimal Label Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation