2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized, 3D- printed fracture fixation plates versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials- biomaterials characteristics and bacterial biofilm formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The roughness of the 3D-Ti plates was 106.44 nm, and that of the Synthes-Ti plates was 209.46 nm, far below the above value, and the low surface roughness reduces the attachment to nearby tissues, which is more conducive to the removal of plates later. However, Mazurek-Popczyk obtained an Sa of 131 nm for 3D-Ti plates and 60.67 nm for Synthes-Ti plates, which was dissimilar from our results [ 20 ]. We believe this is reasonable, considering such factors as processing techniques and testing parameters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The roughness of the 3D-Ti plates was 106.44 nm, and that of the Synthes-Ti plates was 209.46 nm, far below the above value, and the low surface roughness reduces the attachment to nearby tissues, which is more conducive to the removal of plates later. However, Mazurek-Popczyk obtained an Sa of 131 nm for 3D-Ti plates and 60.67 nm for Synthes-Ti plates, which was dissimilar from our results [ 20 ]. We believe this is reasonable, considering such factors as processing techniques and testing parameters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the effect of surface roughness, which is considered one of the key factors influencing the adhesion and colonization of microorganisms on biomaterials. Depressions, micro-cracks and porosities in roughened surfaces provide more favorable colonization sites [ 14 , 38 40 ]. Most studies have revealed a strong positive correlation between surface roughness and the number of viable bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, due to the so-called trajectory guides and rulers, the use of SLM PSIs could prevent possible adverse insertion effects on soft or hard tissues because of sharp edges or displaced mesh [ 17 ]. In addition, the structure of the surfaces of PSIs and, thus, their susceptibility to biofilm formation might play a role in their tissue integration and possible adverse effects [ 30 , 31 ], which gives the need for further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%