2022
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Subjective Tinnitus

Abstract: Background: Personalization of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for tinnitus might be capable to overcome the heterogeneity of treatment responses. The assessment of loudness changes after short rTMS protocols in test sessions has been proposed as a strategy to identify the best protocol for the daily treatment application. However, the therapeutic advantages of this approach are currently not clear. The present study was designed to further investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various protocols involving stimulation frequency, stimulation position, and the laterality of brain stimulation were tested on two different days, effectively demonstrating the consistency of parameters required to achieve the best tinnitus suppression for each individual. These findings underscore the potential for developing individualized rTMS protocols [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various protocols involving stimulation frequency, stimulation position, and the laterality of brain stimulation were tested on two different days, effectively demonstrating the consistency of parameters required to achieve the best tinnitus suppression for each individual. These findings underscore the potential for developing individualized rTMS protocols [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Patients were then randomly assigned to either personalized rTMS (comprising 2000 pulses using the responsive protocol) or standard rTMS (1 Hz; 2000 pulses over the left temporal cortex). The personalized protocol had a greater effect than random stimulation [19]. An analogous method used a similar protocol, where frequencies of 1, 5, 10, and 20 Hz and continuous theta burst stimulation were consecutively administered to the left and right temporoparietal lobes and DLPFC during the experimental session.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts in rTMS personalization for therapeutic use are already pursued and have the potential to account for certain factors of variability such as the individual intrinsic brain state (Chou et al, 2021;Cocchi and Zalesky, 2018;Klooster et al, 2021;Schoisswohl et al, 2022Schoisswohl et al, , 2021Schoisswohl et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from study visits of both treatment groups were analyzed using linear mixed effect models separately for each assessment inventory (e.g., TFI). The model fitting followed the exact same procedure as already outlined in Schoisswohl et al, 2021Schoisswohl et al, & 2022. The following fixed effects as well as their interaction were tested in the model fitting procedure: time (screening, baseline, treatment end, follow-up), treatment group (activate & fire, 1 Hz rTMS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%