2018
DOI: 10.1101/461350
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalization of hybrid brain models from neuroimaging and electrophysiology data

Abstract: Personalization is rapidly becoming standard practice in medical diagnosis and treatment. This study is part of an ambitious program towards computational personalization of neuromodulatory interventions in neuropsychiatry. We propose to model the individual human brain as a network of neural masses embedded in a realistic physical matrix capable of representing measurable electrical brain activity. We call this a hybrid brain model (HBM) to highlight that it encodes both biophysical and physiological characte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such networks, nodes correspond to cortical or sub-cortical brain regions and edges correspond to either structural (i.e., direct connections) or functional (i.e., through synaptic or ephaptic interactions) couplings between these regions. Several computational studies have developed whole-brain network models to explore the relationship between brain function and its underlying connectivity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such networks, nodes correspond to cortical or sub-cortical brain regions and edges correspond to either structural (i.e., direct connections) or functional (i.e., through synaptic or ephaptic interactions) couplings between these regions. Several computational studies have developed whole-brain network models to explore the relationship between brain function and its underlying connectivity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural mass models. Neural mass (semi-empirical) models (NMM), first developed in the early seventies by W. Freeman (17) and F. Lopez de Silva (2), provide a physiologically grounded description of the average synaptic activity and firing rate of a neural population (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). NMMs are increasingly used for local and whole-brain modeling in neurology (e.g., epilepsy (18,19) or Alzheimer's disease (20)) and for understanding and optimizing the effects of transcranial electrical brain stimulation (tES) (6,7,21,22).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural mass (semi-empirical) models (NMM), first developed in the early seventies by W. Freeman (17) and F. Lopez de Silva (2), provide a physiologically grounded description of the average synaptic activity and firing rate of a neural population (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). NMMs are increasingly used for local and whole-brain modeling in neurology (e.g., epilepsy (18,19) or Alzheimer's disease (20)) and for understanding and optimizing the effects of transcranial electrical brain stimulation (tES) (6,7,21,22). The central conceptual elements in this framework are the synapse, which is seen to transduce incoming activity (quantified by firing rate) into a mean membrane potential perturbation in the receiving neuron population, and the sigmoid function transforming population membrane potential to output (mean) firing rate with due account for threshold and saturation effects (see (16) for a nice introduction to the Jansen-Rit model).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, and equally importantly, we used here an interaction model that does not consider the complexity or spatial distribution of pyramidal neurons, or the effects on other types of neurons, or the complexities associated to the dynamical nature of neural physiologymuch as it is done in brain stimulation research, with some justification [14,19,34] for the analysis of tES effects. Only recently the effects of tES have been studied in computational models of the brain [19,86,87] using the lambda-E model discussed above, but yet ignoring the intricacies of micro-cortical network circuitry. Our modeling work and EMOD inherits all these limitations: this is a first approach that will be improved in the future.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%