Abstract:This study looked at whether demographics, religious beliefs, political orientation, personality traits, and money attitudes are correlates of financial capability, knowledge and distress. Over 3,500 British participants completed multiple measures online. As hypothesized, demographics, religious beliefs, political orientation, personality traits, and money attitudes each explained unique variance in financial capability, financial knowledge, and financial distress. Regression and correlational results showed … Show more
“…It is possible for financial knowledge or overconfidence to be related to other variables. For instance, Fenton‐O'Creevy and Furnham (2020) found that individual demographic factors, money attitudes, personality traits, and ideology were related to financial knowledge. We should be cautious in making causal inferences from our analyses, as we did not attempt estimations that might reduce bias due to potential endogeneity.…”
Early distributions from retirement accounts could endanger future retirement income security, and the U.S. has restrictions to discourage them, including possible tax penalties. On the other hand, tapping one's retirement assets may be rational when an individual encounters financial hardship. With the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, early distribution from retirement accounts became an even more attractive option to individuals. In this study, we examined factors related to individuals' decision of taking hardship withdrawals and plan loans, focusing on financial knowledge and overconfidence in financial knowledge, using the 2018 National Financial Capability Study dataset. We found evidence that people may be making early withdrawals without understanding possible consequences. Objective financial knowledge was negatively related to hardship withdrawals and plan loans, but the subjective assessment of financial knowledge was positively related to hardship withdrawals. Respondents with financial knowledge overconfidence (high subjective and low objective knowledge) were more likely to take early withdrawals than those with other combinations of objective and subjective knowledge. We discuss implications for public policy and financial education and advice.
“…It is possible for financial knowledge or overconfidence to be related to other variables. For instance, Fenton‐O'Creevy and Furnham (2020) found that individual demographic factors, money attitudes, personality traits, and ideology were related to financial knowledge. We should be cautious in making causal inferences from our analyses, as we did not attempt estimations that might reduce bias due to potential endogeneity.…”
Early distributions from retirement accounts could endanger future retirement income security, and the U.S. has restrictions to discourage them, including possible tax penalties. On the other hand, tapping one's retirement assets may be rational when an individual encounters financial hardship. With the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, early distribution from retirement accounts became an even more attractive option to individuals. In this study, we examined factors related to individuals' decision of taking hardship withdrawals and plan loans, focusing on financial knowledge and overconfidence in financial knowledge, using the 2018 National Financial Capability Study dataset. We found evidence that people may be making early withdrawals without understanding possible consequences. Objective financial knowledge was negatively related to hardship withdrawals and plan loans, but the subjective assessment of financial knowledge was positively related to hardship withdrawals. Respondents with financial knowledge overconfidence (high subjective and low objective knowledge) were more likely to take early withdrawals than those with other combinations of objective and subjective knowledge. We discuss implications for public policy and financial education and advice.
“…These four scales were designed to assess attitudes to money (Fenton-O'Creevy and Furnham, 2020, von Stumm et al, 2013. The 16 items are categorized into four scales: money as security (Cronbach's alpha = .65), money as autonomy (Cronbach's alpha = .64), money as power (Cronbach's alpha = .76), and money as generosity (Cronbach's alpha = .64).Example items: "The best thing about money is that it means you can influence others" (power); "I would rather save money than spend it" (security); "The main point of earning money is to feel free and be free" (autonomy); and "I often demonstrate my love to people by buying them things" (generosity).…”
Section: Money Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determinants of adult financial capability, financial distress, financial knowledge and financial welfare matter, because they affect a person's health and general welfare (Fenton, O'Creevy & Furnham, 2020). There are various measure of financial literacy and well-being (Bruggen et al, 2017;Folk et al, 2019) but many fewer on financial distress.…”
Due to third party rights in the data, we are unable to place the data in an open repository. However, access to the data may be requested from the first author. Registration: This paper was not pre-registered with the journal Ethics: This was sought and obtained from the Open University's Human Ethics Research Committee, decision number HREC/3764/Fenton-O'Creevy Conflict of interest: in the interests of transparency, Mark Fenton-O'Creevy declares that he received the sum of £5000 for advice on the initial design of the survey on which this paper is based, from a financial services client, who has relied on the survey in producing an online tool for their clients. He received no payment for the analysis of the data for this paper or its preparation and is free of any pressure to report particular findings. The data were collected by an independent market research agency and were fully available (excepting identifying data of participants) to the authors, who conducted all analyses.
“…Outcomes of credit revolve around whether the debt is paid back on time or at all, or whether an individual has late payments or defaults on the debt (Ozdemir & Boran, 2004). Few papers directly study default or late payment rates in relation to specific psychological factors, so instead for this review a general outcome of financial distress is considered, incorporating over-indebtedness (Almenberg et al, 2016) late repayments, repossessions and bankruptcy (Fenton-O'Creevy & Furnham, 2020). This is perhaps the most important aspect for lenders as borrowers more likely to have these outcomes are riskier prospects.…”
Section: Credit Acquisition/use and Outcomesmentioning
Since their introduction in the 1980s, credit scores have been the dominant method used to assess the creditworthiness of individuals. However, they rely heavily on situational factors which may lead to good long term borrowers being denied due to unfortunate recent circumstances. Instead, there is emerging evidence that a number of psychological factors including personality traits, attitudes and behaviours play an important role in the acquisition and outcomes of credit. Taking account of these factors may provide a better picture of the long term creditworthiness of individuals, despite their current circumstances. This review paper takes the important step of collating the latest research on the psychological factors involved throughout the credit process from acquisition to financial outcomes. It highlights the multifaceted nature of personal credit use with the various inextricably linked personality, attitudinal and behavioural factors involved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.