2011
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2011.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality, Emotion, and Mood in Agent-Based Group Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a context-aware model of emotions that can be used to design intelligent agents endowed with emotional capabilities is described in [90]. The study is complemented by also modeling personalities and mood [130].…”
Section: Modeling the User Emotional Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a context-aware model of emotions that can be used to design intelligent agents endowed with emotional capabilities is described in [90]. The study is complemented by also modeling personalities and mood [130].…”
Section: Modeling the User Emotional Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are considered to be low-intensity long-lasting affective states, whereas emotions are considered high intensity, situation specific and brief. The psychology literature is replete with examples of how emotions and moods affect decision making, but personality's role is also essential because of the differences in cognition helping to explain why different people reach different decisions while experiencing the same emotions (Santos et al, 2011).…”
Section: Theory Of Moodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personality is considered to represent the long-lasting individual characteristics that influence motivations and behaviors when facing a given circumstance [Howard & Howard, 1995;John & Srivastava, 1999;Santos et al, 2009]. Researchers of the different perspectives of personality have focused on both describing the personality dynamics within an individual and determining its structure (i.e., the individual's traits that differentiate him or her from the rest).…”
Section: Interindividual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the affect's temporal dynamic process, is in charge of controlling the duration and decay of the affective state. As shown in Table 3.1, it can also use the traits of the agent's personality as an input (see, for example, computational approaches like [Santos et al, 2011]). Certainly there is a need of a balance between the temporal dynamic and the structural dynamic of the affective state in GenIA 3 , so each specialized version of GenIA 3 should pay attention and take care of this issue.…”
Section: Representation For Affective Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%