2017
DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality disorder services in England: findings from a national survey

Abstract: Aims and method We aimed to evaluate the availability and nature of services for people affected by personality disorder in England by conducting a survey of English National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts and independent organisations.Results In England, 84% of organisations reported having at least one dedicated personality disorder service. This represents a fivefold increase compared with a 2002 survey. However, only 55% of organisations reported that patients had equal access across localities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improving access to services and delivering better outcomes for people with personality disorder were central to the policy document ‘Personality Disorder: No Longer a Diagnosis of Exclusion’, which reiterated findings that those with personality disorder often faced a revolving door within services, and owing to insufficient training, resources and skills clinicians were reluctant to work with those with personality disorder. Since this publication, access to care and dedicated personality disorder services in England has significantly improved . However, just under half of the National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts and independent organizations stated that patients did not have equal access to dedicated personality disorder services owing to their area of residence .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving access to services and delivering better outcomes for people with personality disorder were central to the policy document ‘Personality Disorder: No Longer a Diagnosis of Exclusion’, which reiterated findings that those with personality disorder often faced a revolving door within services, and owing to insufficient training, resources and skills clinicians were reluctant to work with those with personality disorder. Since this publication, access to care and dedicated personality disorder services in England has significantly improved . However, just under half of the National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts and independent organizations stated that patients did not have equal access to dedicated personality disorder services owing to their area of residence .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through our role of gate keeper, we were aware that previously, our Trust referred the most complex service users out of area. The national pattern across the UK is likely similar, despite most Trusts declaring some level of specialized PD services . However, NHS England's Five Year Forward Plan is to eliminate inappropriate OATs by 2021, through promoting accessible high‐quality care in the least restrictive setting as close to home as possible .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This growing evidence has spurred the development of specialist community services for PD. A survey within the English NHS found that there had been a fivefold increase in organizations with dedicated PD services between 2002 and 2015, but despite 84% of organizations having a PD service, it remained unclear if the quality of care had improved . Similarly, Tulloch et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has included negative attitudes from some healthcare workers (Dickens, Lamont, & Gray, ), and reports that some people with this diagnosis have had their distress dismissed (Bonnington & Rose, ) have been treated disrespectfully (Lawn & McMahon, ) and treated as a label rather than an individual (Veysey, ). In the UK, this has meant that despite expansion in the provision of specialist services over the last 15 years (Dale et al., ), and the lack of consistent high quality care has recently prompted a government sponsored consensus statement to improve treatment experiences (Lamb, Sibbald, & Stirzaker, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%