2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality assessment, ‘construct validity’, and the significance of theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, one criticism is that the FFM appears to confuse description of what people do with explanation, as well as reifying between-subject differences into within-person variables (Boag, , 2015(Boag, , 2018. In this respect, one criticism is that the FFM appears to confuse description of what people do with explanation, as well as reifying between-subject differences into within-person variables (Boag, , 2015(Boag, , 2018.…”
Section: Themes In Contemporary Australian Personality Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, one criticism is that the FFM appears to confuse description of what people do with explanation, as well as reifying between-subject differences into within-person variables (Boag, , 2015(Boag, , 2018. In this respect, one criticism is that the FFM appears to confuse description of what people do with explanation, as well as reifying between-subject differences into within-person variables (Boag, , 2015(Boag, , 2018.…”
Section: Themes In Contemporary Australian Personality Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the emerging popularity of the FFM and the Big Five, some Australian personality researchers have been critical of the FFM's atheoretical basis and derivation from the lexical approach. In this respect, one criticism is that the FFM appears to confuse description of what people do with explanation, as well as reifying between-subject differences into within-person variables (Boag, , 2015(Boag, , 2018. Nevertheless, the Big Five more generally has proven to be a particularly useful descriptive framework, and Australian personality researchers have been actively addressing causal accounts of within-person processes to explain the manifest traits.…”
Section: Themes In Contemporary Australian Personality Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24–25). Instead, causes and effects must be logically distinct to avoid the circularity associated with explaining the effect in terms of itself (see Maze, 1983; Boag, 2011, 2015b). Since a ‘desire for x ’ describes a relationship (what the person is doing, viz .…”
Section: Freud’s Theory Of Motivation and Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviors are the result of the interaction between genetic factors, past experiences, and labile environmental and social influences [4]. Personality assessment helps us to predict how people behave under various circumstances or how well a person might perform within certain roles [3]. Writing identification is called "graphology", technic or knowledge which determines personality and mental characteristics of individuals by study of handwritings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%