2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and the marginal utility of income: Personality interacts with increases in household income to determine life satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our next step would be to identify whether this personality profiles also shape individuals' preferences regarding the income distribution or inequality in the region. Earlier findings in the literature show that some personality profiles are correlated with larger happiness reports (Boyce, 2010) and that personality also shapes the marginal utility of income (Boyce and Wood, 2011). Our results are consistent with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our next step would be to identify whether this personality profiles also shape individuals' preferences regarding the income distribution or inequality in the region. Earlier findings in the literature show that some personality profiles are correlated with larger happiness reports (Boyce, 2010) and that personality also shapes the marginal utility of income (Boyce and Wood, 2011). Our results are consistent with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Boyce and Wood (2011) also found differences on the marginal utility of income depending on the individual personality, although our results are not identical to theirs. The dissimilarities may be driven by two main differences between the two papers: (i) we use a larger set of personality measures, and (ii) Boyce and Wood (2011) do not estimate separate regressions for each subsample but chose to estimate the model with interactions. To do that, they assume that the effect of each personality measure on life satisfaction is already captured by the individual fixed effect (see section 4.2).…”
Section: Results: the Effect Of Rank And The Role Of The Non-cognitivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unemployed individuals who are conscientious endure the largest decreases in life satisfaction following unemployment (Boyce, A. M. Wood, & Brown, 2010), and conscientiousness is related to enjoyment of one's own income which the unemployed lack (Ameriks et al, 2003;Boyce & A. M. Wood, 2011a). These findings may be interpreted as indicating that, in some ways, it is preferable to be less conscientious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOEP is one of the primary socio-economic datasets with which hundred articles have been published (see http://www.diw.de/en/diw_02.c.221182.en/publications_with_soep_data.html). The authors have used portions of SOEP to answer different research questions in the following published research articles: Boyce, (2010), Boyce & Wood, (2011a), Boyce & Wood, (2011b) ;Boyce, Wood, & Brown, (2010).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach and data do not allow us to control for the time-invariant unobserved individual effects (e.g., genetic predisposition, personality characteristics). These characteristics are found to be very important in explaining individuals' SWB (Boyce and Wood, 2011). In this robustness check, we follow the strategy developed in Akay et al (2012) to partially control for these latent characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%