“…Braithwaite and Law (1978), Kaplan (1984), Olczak, Parcell, andStott (1983), andStein, Sarbin, andKulik (1968) have criticized the conceptualization of delinquency as one-dimensional and have insisted on the need to identify homogeneous classes of antisocial behavior and to investigate the variables related to each separate class. Although a number of studies suggest that analysis of different dimensions of antisocial behavior may throw light on the relationship between personality and delinquency (Hindelang & Weiss, 1972;Lane, 1987;Luengo, Otero, Carrillo-de-la-Pena, & Miron, in press;McGurk & McDougall, 1981), this suggestion has seldom been heeded in research on impulsivity.…”
This study analyzes the relationships between impulsivity and antisocial behavior in a noninstitutionalized sample, taking into account the multidimensional nature of impulsivity and the diversity of types of antisocial behavior. Data were obtained in 1989 and 1990 from 1,226 adolescents aged 12-18 years (583 boys and 643 girls) as part of a longitudinal study of risk factors for drug abuse and delinquency. The patterns of stability or change of the various dimensions of antisocial behavior (rule breaking, vandalism, theft, aggression, and drug taking) in relation to impulsivity were investigated. The results support that self-report measures of impulsivity are closely correlated with antisocial behavior among adolescents. The longitudinally oriented analysis of this work also shows that impulsivity is associated with a future increase in antisocial behavior.
“…Braithwaite and Law (1978), Kaplan (1984), Olczak, Parcell, andStott (1983), andStein, Sarbin, andKulik (1968) have criticized the conceptualization of delinquency as one-dimensional and have insisted on the need to identify homogeneous classes of antisocial behavior and to investigate the variables related to each separate class. Although a number of studies suggest that analysis of different dimensions of antisocial behavior may throw light on the relationship between personality and delinquency (Hindelang & Weiss, 1972;Lane, 1987;Luengo, Otero, Carrillo-de-la-Pena, & Miron, in press;McGurk & McDougall, 1981), this suggestion has seldom been heeded in research on impulsivity.…”
This study analyzes the relationships between impulsivity and antisocial behavior in a noninstitutionalized sample, taking into account the multidimensional nature of impulsivity and the diversity of types of antisocial behavior. Data were obtained in 1989 and 1990 from 1,226 adolescents aged 12-18 years (583 boys and 643 girls) as part of a longitudinal study of risk factors for drug abuse and delinquency. The patterns of stability or change of the various dimensions of antisocial behavior (rule breaking, vandalism, theft, aggression, and drug taking) in relation to impulsivity were investigated. The results support that self-report measures of impulsivity are closely correlated with antisocial behavior among adolescents. The longitudinally oriented analysis of this work also shows that impulsivity is associated with a future increase in antisocial behavior.
“…However, most of these methods have had successive upgrades in the computer science and related ML literatures (Jain, ). Additionally, unsupervised ML has haltingly entered criminology with papers stretching back several decades (Brennan, ; Brennan and Breitenbach, ; Francis, Soothill, and Fligelstone, ; Harris and Jones, ; Hindelang and Weis, ; Jones and Harris, ; Megargee and Bohn, , Raine et al., ).…”
Section: Two Minor Issues Regarding Berk and Bleich's () Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A history of the progressive development of many of these methods is offered by computer scientist Jain (2010), in his article "Data Clustering: 50 Years Beyond K-Means." Hindelang and Weis, 1972;Jones and Harris, 1999;Megargee andBohn, 1979, Raine et al, 2005). Regarding this array of ML methods, we note the rapid software availability and ongoing refinement of both classic and newer ML methods.…”
“…However, these latter studies have been thoroughly reviewed by Elliott and Ageton (1976b). They divided the extant literature into "studies of officially defined drug users and delinquents" (Chein 1964;: Weitzner et al 1973Friedman and Friedman 1973a) and "studies involving normal youth populations" (Robins and Murphy 1967;Jacoby et al 1073;Friedman and Friedman 1973b;Goode 1973;Johnston 1973;O'Donnell et al 1976;Jessor 1976;Gold and Reimer 1974;Elliott and Ageton 1976a;Hindelang and Weiss 1972).…”
The Research Analysis and Utilization System (RAUS) is designed to serve four functions: Collection and systematic classification of findings of all intramural and extramural research supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Evaluation by scientific peers of the latest research findings; Regular dissemination of findings to researchers in the field and to administrators, planners, instructors, and other interested persons; v init were also covered. Dr. Denise Kandel, who chaired the meting, has presented a comprehensive overview of the subject in the first paper. Other aspects of the topic reviewed include the epidemiology of drug use patterns among teenagers ; the personality and sociodemographic factors associated with drug use; the influence of family and peer group on the adolescent's drug-abusing behavior or lack thereof; the relationship between drug abuse and crime; and a review of the biomedical consequences of drug use in adolescents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.