Personality and coping in life challenge narratives

Greene, Rachel E.; Cowan, Henry R.; McAdams, Dan P.

doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103960

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding Hypothesis 1, certain personality factors (conscientiousness and positivity) demonstrated their protective function against stress by positively and directly predicting the behaviors that make up the SLPS competency, and negatively and indirectly predicting stress levels. This result concurs with previous research that asserted the factors of conscientiousness and positivity as personal factors that protect against stress (Caprara and Steca, 2005;Caprara et al, 2017;Greene et al, 2020) and as predictors of adequate learning processes (Biggs, 1970b). Previous evidence showed a positive, partially predictive relationship between different factors of the SLPS competency and the variables of deep approach, academic behavioral confidence, problem-focused coping (Leszko et al, 2020), positive emotions, and resilience (de la Fuente et al, 2017a.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

2022

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

About FrontiersFrontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers Journal SeriesThe Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers Journal Series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to QualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

2022

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The assumptions of Hypothesis 3 were also empirically supported by our results. The personal factor neuroticism was confirmed as a personal risk factor since it minimizes positivity (Greene et al, 2020), as well as protective factors of the SLPS competency, such as academic behavioral confidence, selfregulation, and resilience (McDonnell and Semkovska, 2020). Neuroticism is also a positive predictor of the risk factors analyzed here, such as surface approach, procrastination, burnout, and negative achievement emotions, as supported by abundant prior evidence (Chen et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Path Analysis Model of Protection and Risk Factors for University Academic Stress: Analysis and Psychoeducational Implications for the COVID-19 Emergency

Fuente

2021

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to empirically validate hypothesized predictive relationships of protection and risk factors for experiencing academic stress. A synthesis of models—the presage–process–product model; the studying, learning and performing under stress competency model; and self- vs. external-regulatory theory—underlies the investigation and is important for assessment and guidance in stress situations within the university context. Over the course of an academic year, a sample of 564 Spanish university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires, in an online format, on several psychological variables connected to academic stress. Correlational analysis and the path analysis model, within an ex post facto design, were used to build empirical models of the presage–process–product factors that constitute protection or risk factors in academic stress. Two statistically acceptable models appeared: one with protection factors and another with risk factors in predicting and preventing academic stress at a university. These results support the need for psychology units at university that have a preventive, health and education focus, going beyond the merely clinical. Focus on an individual is insufficient, given that there are also contextual factors that predispose academic stress. Discussion, conclusions, and implications for assessment and intervention in academic stress in university students and teachers, within the present COVID-19 crisis, are offered.

show abstract

“…'s (2016) findings, and considering that simulations tend to be conservative (Harrison et al., 1996), it seems that inflationary CMB is less likely than previously believed (Fuller et al., 2016 p. 3195, labelled the probability of inflationary CMB as ‘nil’). Yet, CMV has traditionally been named as a culprit for the inflation of coefficients (e.g., Crampton & Wagner, 1994)—and this is what most researchers are still concerned about (e.g., Greene et al., 2020; Zeijen et al., 2018).…”

Section: Early Quantitative Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research

Bozionelos

Simmering

2021

Human Res Mgmt Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New key evidence on common method variance (CMV) has been generated in the last decade (including quantitative and qualitative reviews, and simulations) to estimate its real validity threat, and evaluate the post hoc techniques to detect and correct for its effects. This work looks at the new evidence, and reviews all HRM-related empirical articles published in the last 10 years in six major journals. The following primary conclusions are drawn. First, adoption of new knowledge about CMV by the empirical literature has been uneven. Second, published research in these journals indicates few incidences of meaningful distortion of estimates due to CMV, even when post hoc tests are used to detect it. Third, these findings in the empirical literature mirror the conclusions of reviews and simulations of the last 10 years, which indicate that the probability of significant distortion of estimates because of CMV is very limited.

show abstract

Personality and coping in life challenge narratives

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

A Path Analysis Model of Protection and Risk Factors for University Academic Stress: Analysis and Psychoeducational Implications for the COVID-19 Emergency

Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About