2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45889-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and Agents: Formalising State and Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, researchers in agent-based modelling have begun using personality to determine agent behaviors. Early models have interpretations that loosely match psychology literature, are context dependent, and largely unverified (Ahrndt et al, 2015;Salvit and Sklar, 2012). More recently, Lim and Bentley (2018) created a more general, problemindependent computational model aiming to improve our understanding of the effects of personality on teamwork.…”
Section: Agent-based Models Of Personality In Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, researchers in agent-based modelling have begun using personality to determine agent behaviors. Early models have interpretations that loosely match psychology literature, are context dependent, and largely unverified (Ahrndt et al, 2015;Salvit and Sklar, 2012). More recently, Lim and Bentley (2018) created a more general, problemindependent computational model aiming to improve our understanding of the effects of personality on teamwork.…”
Section: Agent-based Models Of Personality In Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Statistical studies of data produced by individuals as they attempt different tasks are used to derive statistical models or psychological theories. Some attempts to use computer modelling have been made, but their predictions are largely unverified with data (Ahrndt et al, 2015;Bentley, 2018, 2019b;Salvit and Sklar, 2012). Neither approach explains teamwork adequately-the former suffers from a lack of data on teams and may not offer insights into why certain combinations of individuals may work better than others, while the latter suffers from a lack of rigorous corroboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Openness represents individuals' behavioral preferences for being inventive, curious, and emotional. People with low Openness are less likely to experiment new ideas and experiences(SMITH et al, 2019;BARAŃCZUK, 2019;AHRNDT;FÄHNDRICH;ALBAYRAK, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%