2012
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalising Learning in Teacher Education through the use of Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed these teachers are also undecided and potentially misinformed about the value of these strategies and our study will help provide an evidence based discussion point for some of the key issues teachers face. Our study adds to the "compelling evidence of the importance of encouraging student control over the learning process as a whole" (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010, p. 1), and shows that personalising learning is successful in improving student engagement and the students' learning experiences in higher education (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010;Jones & McLean, 2012). It is beneficial for student engagement and experiences to have longer face-to-face sessions (in this case it was 2 hour tutorial sessions) in which structured small group activities were set up by the teacher (TW) for interactive, collaborative learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our results showed these teachers are also undecided and potentially misinformed about the value of these strategies and our study will help provide an evidence based discussion point for some of the key issues teachers face. Our study adds to the "compelling evidence of the importance of encouraging student control over the learning process as a whole" (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010, p. 1), and shows that personalising learning is successful in improving student engagement and the students' learning experiences in higher education (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010;Jones & McLean, 2012). It is beneficial for student engagement and experiences to have longer face-to-face sessions (in this case it was 2 hour tutorial sessions) in which structured small group activities were set up by the teacher (TW) for interactive, collaborative learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Within the current circumstances, both QUT ARG and CSHS recognized an opportunity to develop and implement an online CS project and provide a platform to keep students engaged during the COVID‐19 isolation period. Moreover, the use of technology underscores the potential to increase the engagement and motivation of learners and allows catering to different learning styles (Jones & McLean, 2012).…”
Section: Motivation For the Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning analytics and prompts for next steps and progressions in learning, which are an emergent practice in schools, should therefore also be practised in teacher education. Furthermore, options for self‐paced and group studies and the use of individual programme plans and learning contracts, as well as communities of inquiry, should be made available in teacher education (Sliwka, ; Jones & McLean, ). So far, research on individualised assessment in teacher education has mostly been limited to aptitude tests and qualifying examinations to recruit teacher training candidates.…”
Section: The Learning Environment Is Acutely Sensitive To the Individmentioning
confidence: 99%