2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults’ Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the findings presented in this study are for wrist-worn acceleration data; although the methodology presented should, in principle, be applicable to other body placements, specific detailed thresholds and findings reported herein would be different for acceleration data recorded elsewhere (e.g., on the hip), as previous work has shown [15,24,49]. Finally, we did not consider age-, gender-, and motor-competence-specific analyses due to the relatively limited sample size to perform these detailed stratifications: there is some work that suggests that these affect accelerometer outputs, calling for more personalized threshold-based methods [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, the findings presented in this study are for wrist-worn acceleration data; although the methodology presented should, in principle, be applicable to other body placements, specific detailed thresholds and findings reported herein would be different for acceleration data recorded elsewhere (e.g., on the hip), as previous work has shown [15,24,49]. Finally, we did not consider age-, gender-, and motor-competence-specific analyses due to the relatively limited sample size to perform these detailed stratifications: there is some work that suggests that these affect accelerometer outputs, calling for more personalized threshold-based methods [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, the descriptive data presented in this manuscript can be compared in the future with as many alternative cut-points as needed, for example if the VO 2net age-equivalent cut-points were expanded to the whole human lifespan [ 38 ]. In the same vein, research in the area of cut-point-based metrics is moving towards post-data collection approaches such as personalized accelerometer cut-points using machine learning [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent efforts determining cut-points in people above 70 years of age, there are no established cut-points for 100-year-old or frail individuals. The use of cut-points validated in younger older adults would result in a floor effect when applied to centenarians, with the time spent by centenarians in LiPA or MVPA being under-estimated due to the inappropriateness of the “one size fits all” approach [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Van Kuppevelt et al [6] used the HSMM model to establish accelerometer cut-point thresholds, while Montoye et al [7] utilized DL algorithms to search for cut-points of various activity intensities based on human basic characteristics. Additionally, Nnamoko's team [8] predicted personalized accelerometer cut-points for the elderly's exercise behavior through machine learning and compared the cut-point prediction effects of various models on wrist-worn and hip-worn accelerometers. The results revealed that machine learning models outperformed traditional fixed cut-points, and customized optimized models exhibited superior performance compared to generic models [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%