Abstract:Researchers strive hard to develop effective ways to detect and cope with enduring high-level daily stress as early as possible to prevent serious health consequences. Although research has traditionally been conducted in laboratory settings, a set of new studies have recently begun to be conducted in ecological environments with unobtrusive wearable devices. Since patterns of stress are ideographic, person-independent models have generally lower accuracies. On the contrary, person-specific models have higher … Show more
“…Some parameters like measuring stress using nasal ST and videos, wearable sensors, mobile phones, blink detection, typing behavior, human voice were also focused. From various machine learning classifiers used in previous papers, Random forest (RF) [23], [26], [38], SVM [20], [23], [26], [35]- [38], and decision trees [24], [35], [37]- [38], were found to be the most effective among all due to their better results as compared to others. Also, GSR, HRV, and ST features were most useful in stress prediction.…”
Section: Existing Surveys and Reviews On Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological signals most commonly used in stress detection approaches are Heart Rate (HR) [17], [22]- [26], Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Skin Temperature (ST) [23]- [26], Skin Conductance (also called Galvanic Skin Response (GSR)) [17], [19]- [22], [24]- [26], [35], [37], Blood Pressure (BP) [23], [37], and Respiration Rate (RR) [18], [36], [55]. HRV is the beat-to-beat variability and has time-domain, frequency-domain, and non-linear domain indices for analysis.…”
Section: B Physiological Signals and Mental Stress Correlation Figure 1 Schematic Diagram Showing Common Places Of Wearable Sensors On Humentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compromised accuracy due to inaccurate data and inputs, need a regular update of rules of a fuzzy logic control system, requires a lot of testing for validation and verification with hardware, completely dependent on human knowledge and skill, not always broadly accepted due to inaccurate results. [20], [23]- [24], [26], [34], [38], [45]- [50].…”
Stress is an escalated psycho-physiological state of the human body emerging in response to a challenging event or a demanding condition. Environmental factors that trigger stress are called stressors. In case of prolonged exposure to multiple stressors impacting simultaneously, a person's mental and physical health can be adversely affected which can further lead to chronic health issues. To prevent stress-related issues, it is necessary to detect them in the nascent stages which are possible only by continuous monitoring of stress. Wearable devices promise real-time and continuous data collection, which helps in personal stress monitoring. In this paper, a comprehensive review has been presented, which focuses on stress detection using wearable sensors and applied machine learning techniques. This paper investigates the stress detection approaches adopted in accordance with the sensory devices such as wearable sensors, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electroencephalography (EEG), and Photoplethysmography (PPG), and also depending on various environments like during driving, studying, and working. The stressors, techniques, results, advantages, limitations, and issues for each study are highlighted and expected to provide a path for future research studies. Also, a multimodal stress detection system using a wearable sensor-based deep learning technique has been proposed at the end.
“…Some parameters like measuring stress using nasal ST and videos, wearable sensors, mobile phones, blink detection, typing behavior, human voice were also focused. From various machine learning classifiers used in previous papers, Random forest (RF) [23], [26], [38], SVM [20], [23], [26], [35]- [38], and decision trees [24], [35], [37]- [38], were found to be the most effective among all due to their better results as compared to others. Also, GSR, HRV, and ST features were most useful in stress prediction.…”
Section: Existing Surveys and Reviews On Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological signals most commonly used in stress detection approaches are Heart Rate (HR) [17], [22]- [26], Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Skin Temperature (ST) [23]- [26], Skin Conductance (also called Galvanic Skin Response (GSR)) [17], [19]- [22], [24]- [26], [35], [37], Blood Pressure (BP) [23], [37], and Respiration Rate (RR) [18], [36], [55]. HRV is the beat-to-beat variability and has time-domain, frequency-domain, and non-linear domain indices for analysis.…”
Section: B Physiological Signals and Mental Stress Correlation Figure 1 Schematic Diagram Showing Common Places Of Wearable Sensors On Humentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compromised accuracy due to inaccurate data and inputs, need a regular update of rules of a fuzzy logic control system, requires a lot of testing for validation and verification with hardware, completely dependent on human knowledge and skill, not always broadly accepted due to inaccurate results. [20], [23]- [24], [26], [34], [38], [45]- [50].…”
Stress is an escalated psycho-physiological state of the human body emerging in response to a challenging event or a demanding condition. Environmental factors that trigger stress are called stressors. In case of prolonged exposure to multiple stressors impacting simultaneously, a person's mental and physical health can be adversely affected which can further lead to chronic health issues. To prevent stress-related issues, it is necessary to detect them in the nascent stages which are possible only by continuous monitoring of stress. Wearable devices promise real-time and continuous data collection, which helps in personal stress monitoring. In this paper, a comprehensive review has been presented, which focuses on stress detection using wearable sensors and applied machine learning techniques. This paper investigates the stress detection approaches adopted in accordance with the sensory devices such as wearable sensors, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electroencephalography (EEG), and Photoplethysmography (PPG), and also depending on various environments like during driving, studying, and working. The stressors, techniques, results, advantages, limitations, and issues for each study are highlighted and expected to provide a path for future research studies. Also, a multimodal stress detection system using a wearable sensor-based deep learning technique has been proposed at the end.
“…is app presents the stress state of a child in real time and according to time zones. It serves as a medium for real-time monitoring, which enables users to apply it habitually and constantly [35,36].…”
A technology must be developed to automatically identify extreme stress states of children who cannot properly express their emotions when recognizing dangerous situations, which threaten the safety of children, in real time. This study presents a stress-state identification model for children based on machine learning, biometric data, a smart band for collecting biometric data, and a mobile application for monitoring the stress state of the child classified. In addition, through an experiment comparing a dataset using only voice data and a dataset using both voice and heart rate data, we aimed to verify the effectiveness of the combination of the two biosignal datasets. As a result of the experiment, the SVM model showed the highest performance with an accuracy of 88.53% for the dataset using both voice data and heart rate data. The results of this study presented strong implications for the possibility of automating the stress-state identification of a child, and it is expected that the developed method can be used to take preventive measures for dangerous situations to children.
“…These, although not an exhaustive list, are to some extent physiological signals that have become standard for physiology tracking research—slowly crossing disciplines and making their way into affective health tracking, interaction design, and other domains of interest. Moreover, with objectives that range from out-of-the-lab psychophysiology tracking [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] to new perspectives in interaction design [ 43 , 49 , 60 ] our work has often addressed biosignals through other available biosignal research platforms beyond BITalino, such as biosignalsplux [ 61 ], Empatica E4 [ 62 ], Arduino accessories like the Grove GSR [ 63 ], or even commercial wearables such as the Samsung Gear S2 [ 64 ] among others.…”
Research in the use of ubiquitous technologies, tracking systems and wearables within mental health domains is on the rise. In recent years, affective technologies have gained traction and garnered the interest of interdisciplinary fields as the research on such technologies matured. However, while the role of movement and bodily experience to affective experience is well-established, how to best address movement and engagement beyond measuring cues and signals in technology-driven interactions has been unclear. In a joint industry-academia effort, we aim to remodel how affective technologies can help address body and emotional self-awareness. We present an overview of biosignals that have become standard in low-cost physiological monitoring and show how these can be matched with methods and engagements used by interaction designers skilled in designing for bodily engagement and aesthetic experiences. Taking both strands of work together offers unprecedented design opportunities that inspire further research. Through first-person soma design, an approach that draws upon the designer’s felt experience and puts the sentient body at the forefront, we outline a comprehensive work for the creation of novel interactions in the form of couplings that combine biosensing and body feedback modalities of relevance to affective health. These couplings lie within the creation of design toolkits that have the potential to render rich embodied interactions to the designer/user. As a result we introduce the concept of “orchestration”. By orchestration, we refer to the design of the overall interaction: coupling sensors to actuation of relevance to the affective experience; initiating and closing the interaction; habituating; helping improve on the users’ body awareness and engagement with emotional experiences; soothing, calming, or energising, depending on the affective health condition and the intentions of the designer. Through the creation of a range of prototypes and couplings we elicited requirements on broader orchestration mechanisms. First-person soma design lets researchers look afresh at biosignals that, when experienced through the body, are called to reshape affective technologies with novel ways to interpret biodata, feel it, understand it and reflect upon our bodies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.