The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2975351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Stress-Level Clustering and Decision-Level Smoothing to Enhance the Performance of Ambulatory Stress Detection With Smartwatches

Abstract: Researchers strive hard to develop effective ways to detect and cope with enduring high-level daily stress as early as possible to prevent serious health consequences. Although research has traditionally been conducted in laboratory settings, a set of new studies have recently begun to be conducted in ecological environments with unobtrusive wearable devices. Since patterns of stress are ideographic, person-independent models have generally lower accuracies. On the contrary, person-specific models have higher … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some parameters like measuring stress using nasal ST and videos, wearable sensors, mobile phones, blink detection, typing behavior, human voice were also focused. From various machine learning classifiers used in previous papers, Random forest (RF) [23], [26], [38], SVM [20], [23], [26], [35]- [38], and decision trees [24], [35], [37]- [38], were found to be the most effective among all due to their better results as compared to others. Also, GSR, HRV, and ST features were most useful in stress prediction.…”
Section: Existing Surveys and Reviews On Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some parameters like measuring stress using nasal ST and videos, wearable sensors, mobile phones, blink detection, typing behavior, human voice were also focused. From various machine learning classifiers used in previous papers, Random forest (RF) [23], [26], [38], SVM [20], [23], [26], [35]- [38], and decision trees [24], [35], [37]- [38], were found to be the most effective among all due to their better results as compared to others. Also, GSR, HRV, and ST features were most useful in stress prediction.…”
Section: Existing Surveys and Reviews On Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological signals most commonly used in stress detection approaches are Heart Rate (HR) [17], [22]- [26], Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Skin Temperature (ST) [23]- [26], Skin Conductance (also called Galvanic Skin Response (GSR)) [17], [19]- [22], [24]- [26], [35], [37], Blood Pressure (BP) [23], [37], and Respiration Rate (RR) [18], [36], [55]. HRV is the beat-to-beat variability and has time-domain, frequency-domain, and non-linear domain indices for analysis.…”
Section: B Physiological Signals and Mental Stress Correlation Figure 1 Schematic Diagram Showing Common Places Of Wearable Sensors On Humentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is app presents the stress state of a child in real time and according to time zones. It serves as a medium for real-time monitoring, which enables users to apply it habitually and constantly [35,36].…”
Section: System Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These, although not an exhaustive list, are to some extent physiological signals that have become standard for physiology tracking research—slowly crossing disciplines and making their way into affective health tracking, interaction design, and other domains of interest. Moreover, with objectives that range from out-of-the-lab psychophysiology tracking [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] to new perspectives in interaction design [ 43 , 49 , 60 ] our work has often addressed biosignals through other available biosignal research platforms beyond BITalino, such as biosignalsplux [ 61 ], Empatica E4 [ 62 ], Arduino accessories like the Grove GSR [ 63 ], or even commercial wearables such as the Samsung Gear S2 [ 64 ] among others.…”
Section: Sensing the Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%