2007
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.048520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the contribution of personal, social and environmental factors to mediating socioeconomic (educational) inequalities in women's leisure-time walking and walking for transport. Methods: A community sample of 1282 women provided survey data on walking for leisure and transport; educational level; enjoyment of, and self-efficacy for, walking; physical activity barriers and intentions; social support for physical activity; sporting/recreational club membership; dog ownership; and perceive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
170
3
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
170
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the papers reporting social patterning in the execution of different health behaviours did not formally test for the moderating effects of SES on the relationship between intention and self‐efficacy with behaviour (Ball et al ., 2007, 2009; Bere et al ., 2008; Cerin & Leslie, 2008; De Cocker et al ., 2012; Kamphuis et al ., 2008, 2009; Leganger & Kraft, 2003; Murray et al ., 2012). Furthermore, the few papers that did test for such moderating effects have been inconsistent, reporting no significant effects of moderation by SES on intention to be more physically active (Schüz et al ., 2012), or to eat more fruits and vegetables (Godin, Amireault, et al ., 2010), with Godin, Sheeran, et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the papers reporting social patterning in the execution of different health behaviours did not formally test for the moderating effects of SES on the relationship between intention and self‐efficacy with behaviour (Ball et al ., 2007, 2009; Bere et al ., 2008; Cerin & Leslie, 2008; De Cocker et al ., 2012; Kamphuis et al ., 2008, 2009; Leganger & Kraft, 2003; Murray et al ., 2012). Furthermore, the few papers that did test for such moderating effects have been inconsistent, reporting no significant effects of moderation by SES on intention to be more physically active (Schüz et al ., 2012), or to eat more fruits and vegetables (Godin, Amireault, et al ., 2010), with Godin, Sheeran, et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, these studies provide an inconsistent pattern of results with, for example, some finding associations with social patterning only amongst women (Pan et al ., 2009), and some only for leisure‐time activity (Ball et al ., 2007). The self‐report nature of the measures used to measure behaviour is another weakness of all these studies, not least because social desirability bias may be socially patterned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aquatic environments such as rivers, lakes and the coast) and physical activity (e.g. McCormack et al, 2008;Ball et al, 2007). One of the most influential studies was conducted by Bauman et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 between crime and PA. Second, the measurement of crime used in these studies does not explicitly capture the sources of insecurity (i.e., the reasons why an individual might feel "unsafe" walking in their neighbourhood at night), and has been criticised for overestimating concerns about crime that respondents may rarely encounter, but nonetheless feel apprehensive about (Ball et al, 2007;Booth et al, 2000;Ferraro and Grange, 1987).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%