Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: An integrative model of adjustment to abortion.

Major, Brenda; Richards, Caroline; Cooper, Melanie M.; Cozzarelli, Catherine; Zubek, Josephine

doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.735

Cited by 84 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This dynamic and concomitant process between affective and cognitive results in positive or negative responses to adversity; and resilience as strengths of “identification, fortification, and enrichment of resilient protective qualities or factors’’ (Richardson, 2002, p. 308). This line dissociates resilience behavior from facing adversity and is present in a growing set of studies that show that, although these concepts are interchangeable, they are distinct constructs (Campbell-Sills et al , 2006; Major et al , 1998; Van Vliet, 2008). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…This dynamic and concomitant process between affective and cognitive results in positive or negative responses to adversity; and (3) resilience as strengths of "identification, fortification, and enrichment of resilient protective qualities or factors'' (Richardson, 2002, p. 308). This line dissociates resilience behavior from facing adversity and is present in a growing set of studies that show that, although these concepts are interchangeable, they are distinct constructs (Campbell-Sills et al, 2006;Major et al, 1998;Van Vliet, 2008). Korber and McNaughton (2017) bring an understanding of resilience that highlights the value of entrepreneurial self-awareness, reflexivity and continuous learning.…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The integrative approach in the study of resilience in female entrepreneurship

Nassif

Garçon

2022

EJTD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to understand resilience in entrepreneurial behavior and the major adversities faced by women entrepreneurs and identify theoretical and empirical bases that support the use of the integrative approach as appropriate to studies of resilience in women entrepreneurs. Design/methodology/approach In this exploratory-theoretical study, the authors adopted a narrative review of the literature on Female Entrepreneurship, Business and Resilience. The databases researched were: Web of Science, Social Citation Index and Scopus, of which 52 were submitted to analysis through techniques of comparison and contrast between theory, classical studies and applied research. Findings The study illuminates the concept of resilience aligned with entrepreneurship and the major adversities of female entrepreneurship. It also indicates the competence of the integrative approach in investigating and analyzing resilience as a complex, functional and emotional phenomenon between women entrepreneurs and their business environment. Research limitations/implications This study indicates that the integrative approach can offer an explanatory device about the relationships between affectivity and cognition in the resilient behavior of women when encountering difficulties in the entrepreneurial process. It also indicates paths for future research that can empirically prove the degree of these constructs in the resilient behavior of women entrepreneurs, having the difficulties related to the gender stereotype as a point of interest. Practical implications The contribution to the managerial field is to alert women entrepreneurs about the need to understand the role of affectivity and cognition in facing adversity to strengthen their resilient behavior. Social implications The contribution to the managerial field is to alert women entrepreneurs about the need to understand the role of affectivity and cognition in facing adversity to strengthen their resilient behavior. Originality/value This study provides original evidence that cognitive and affective aspects influence women’s entrepreneurial behavior with the same degree of importance. Therefore, they must be investigated jointly. This discovery brings relevance to theoretical and empirical studies on this topic.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

The integrative approach in the study of resilience in female entrepreneurship

Nassif

Garçon

2022

EJTD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, it is hypothesized that participants had developed strong internal and external coping resources that helped to mitigate negative outcomes, which aligns with previous research. 48 , 49 Social support may also have acted as a buffer against stigma being linked to decision satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stigma, Social Support, and Decision Satisfaction in Terminations of Pregnancy for Medical Reasons

Hendrix,

Roncoroni,

Magdamo

et al. 2023

Women's Health Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Existing abortion stigma research has rarely isolated the reason for termination; thus, the consequences of termination for medical reasons (TFMR) are poorly understood. We aimed to understand the association of stigma and social support with decision satisfaction in TFMR. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study on the experiences of 132 individuals who had a TFMR in the second or third trimester. We recruited participants via Facebook. Most participants were non-Hispanic White (85.6%), between 31 and 40 years old (72.7%), highly educated (84.1% with a 4-year degree), and married (89.4%). Participants completed an online demographic data questionnaire, including questions about stigma and social support, and an adapted satisfaction with decision survey. We used t -tests to explore the connection of stigma and social support with decision satisfaction. Results: Results did not reveal an association between stigma and decision satisfaction, but showed that higher social support is associated with higher decision satisfaction. Decision satisfaction was higher in participants who experienced more than one source of support [ t (130) = 2.527, p = 0.01], compared with those reporting only one source of support, and in those who experienced support from a relative [ t (130) = 1.983, p = 0.049] and physician [ t (130) = 2.357, p = 0.020] than in those who did not. Discussion: Social support can alleviate the suffering related to TFMR. Exploring how different forms of social support, including therapy groups, can impact decision satisfaction might help develop interventions to improve postabortion outcomes. Practice Implications: Provider training must encourage providers to (1) support patients having a TFMR and (2) connect patients with other sources of support.

show abstract