2015
DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1005058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal reflections on exploring social media in medicine

Abstract: Social media is difficult to explain to a physician who has never used it. The medical literature on its pitfalls and abuses has overshadowed its positive applications and made many physicians wary of it. While I was initially reluctant to develop my own presence on social media, since embracing it as a tool for teaching and learning I have developed a different perspective. I see it as a tool that can be used positively or negatively. Much like a megaphone, it can amplify our voice so that the impact of our w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional 'publish or perish' approach to academia has been displaced by 'get visible or vanish' (Doyle & Cuthill 2015). Social media provide the possibility of amplifying the voice of researchers beyond the academy (Bombaci et al 2016;Pearce 2015;Thoma 2015) while also enhancing the prospects of traditional scholarly performance measures such as citations (Eysenbach 2011;Ortega 2017). With social media available to anyone with internet access, unlike traditional scholarly outputs which for the most part remain behind paywalls, (social) science has been opened up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional 'publish or perish' approach to academia has been displaced by 'get visible or vanish' (Doyle & Cuthill 2015). Social media provide the possibility of amplifying the voice of researchers beyond the academy (Bombaci et al 2016;Pearce 2015;Thoma 2015) while also enhancing the prospects of traditional scholarly performance measures such as citations (Eysenbach 2011;Ortega 2017). With social media available to anyone with internet access, unlike traditional scholarly outputs which for the most part remain behind paywalls, (social) science has been opened up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2015, the Canadian FOAM community comprised approximately 10 unique websites with no comprehensive national platform or consistent engagement with geographically disparate collaborators. These websites were challenged by reliance on a small, junior volunteer workforce and found it difficult to quickly produce quality content …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DIT is a multiple-choice instrument in which participants read a dilemma and rate 12 related items on a 5-point scale of importance; they then rank-order the rated items in terms of their importance to the dilemma. According to [10], from 70 to 100 studies on average that utilize the DIT and DIT-2 have been conducted annually for the past decade. The DIT-2, created in 1999, provides both a P score and an N2 score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%