2020
DOI: 10.1111/ans.16194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal protective equipment and evidence‐based advice for surgical departments during COVID‐19

Abstract: Background Inconsistencies regarding the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) have raised concerns for the safety of surgical staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. This rapid review synthesizes the literature and includes input from clinical experts to provide evidence‐based guidance for surgical services. Methods The rapid review comprised of targeted searches in PubMed and grey literature. Pertinent findings were discussed by a working group of clinical experts, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were concerns in the Australian and New Zealand media that PPE was in short supply. To address this concern a rapid review was conducted on Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19): Evidence‐Based Guidance from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons 55 and a subsequent manuscript published in this issue 63 . It was concluded that adequate PPE was available in accordance with the COVID‐19 status in Australia and New Zealand, however this situation could have changed rapidly if a second wave of infection occurred after containment measures were relaxed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were concerns in the Australian and New Zealand media that PPE was in short supply. To address this concern a rapid review was conducted on Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19): Evidence‐Based Guidance from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons 55 and a subsequent manuscript published in this issue 63 . It was concluded that adequate PPE was available in accordance with the COVID‐19 status in Australia and New Zealand, however this situation could have changed rapidly if a second wave of infection occurred after containment measures were relaxed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 As SARS-CoV-2 can spread rapidly even when clinically undetectable, patient history must be screened for potential sources of exposure to the virus (Table 1). Surgical patients from population groups at high risk of contracting COVID-19 21,26 should be treated with appropriate perioperative precautions, 7,10,12 and if it is unlikely to worsen postoperative outcomes, surgery should be delayed for preoperative RT-PCR testing ( Table 2). Patients from 'essential' professions that are at high risk of exposure to COVID-19 (e.g.…”
Section: Importance Of Exposure Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,17,18,28,31,39, The literature also suggests that olfactory or gustatory dysfunction, particularly of sudden onset, No preoperative investigation for SARS-CoV-2 infection † †Proceed to surgery with surgical staff wearing full PPE and taking appropriate intraoperative precautions, especially for potential aerosol-generating procedures. 7,10,12 Isolate patient postoperatively and test for SARS-CoV-2 infection when possible.…”
Section: Symptoms Associated With Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the infection rate of HCWs is significantly higher than that of non-HCWs [11]. In order to deal with HCW infections, researchers in China and elsewhere have explored the causes of HCW infections [12], revealed the transmission routes leading to HCW infections [13], and formulated allocation schemes to address resource limitations [14] and protective measures [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%