2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection

Abstract: Models of the attentional blink phenomenon (AB) typically assume that unattended information is processed to the post-perceptual level prior to selection for access to consciousness. The present experiments test this assumption by manipulating the perceptual load of the first target task (T1) and whether the second target (T2) was the participant's own name or someone else's name. In three experiments, increasing T1-load increased the severity of the AB for personal names. The results suggest that selection du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, audiovisually incongruent T1 pairs place greater processing demands at T1 and thereby reduce the attentional resources available for T2 processing resulting in decreased performance (Visser, 2007; Giesbrecht et al, 2009; Burt et al, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, audiovisually incongruent T1 pairs place greater processing demands at T1 and thereby reduce the attentional resources available for T2 processing resulting in decreased performance (Visser, 2007; Giesbrecht et al, 2009; Burt et al, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the significant three-way interaction, we conducted analyses of the magnitude of T2 deficit by subtracting T2 performance in the 300-msec T1-T2 SOA condition from the 800-msec condition (Giesbrecht, Sya, & Lewis, 2009;Jackson & Raymond, 2006). In the TMS after T1 onset condition, there was a significant effect of TMS site [F(3, 30) = 3.98, p < .02; Figure 2C].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in semantic processing presumably occurs because the reconfiguration of the attentional-set from one task to the other is a resource-demanding process that interferes with the perceptual processing of T2 (Vachon et al, 2007; Vachon and Jolicoeur, 2011). Similarly, Giesbrecht et al (2007, 2009) have used both electrophysiological and behavioral approaches to demonstrate that increasing T1 task load can suppress the extent to which semantic and high priority information (e.g., personal names) can survive the AB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both experiments, the first target (T1) was a flanker-type stimulus consisting of a single arrow flanked by pairs of arrows pointing either in the same direction (congruent, e.g., >>>>>) or in different directions (incongruent, e.g., <<><<). We refer to the congruent and incongruent conditions as low and high T1 load, respectively (Giesbrecht et al, 2007, 2009). Unlike previous studies that have used blocked T1 load conditions to demonstrate the effects load on post-perceptual processing of information presented during the AB (i.e., Giesbrecht et al, 2007, 2009), in the present experiment the two types of T1 load trials were randomly intermixed within experimental blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation