PsycTESTS Dataset 2000
DOI: 10.1037/t38751-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal and Social Performance Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…), a long-acting atypical injectable antipsychotic, significantly improved the PANSS total score compared with placebo, as well as CGI-S, PANSS Marder factor scores, and responder rates when administered once monthly, without oral supplementation, into the gluteal muscle in patients with symptomatic schizophrenia. The PSP scale, a validated scale that assesses personal and social functioning (Nasrallah et al, 2008;Morosini et al, 2000;Patrick et al, 2009) did not show a significant treatment difference, perhaps due to the high placebo response observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), a long-acting atypical injectable antipsychotic, significantly improved the PANSS total score compared with placebo, as well as CGI-S, PANSS Marder factor scores, and responder rates when administered once monthly, without oral supplementation, into the gluteal muscle in patients with symptomatic schizophrenia. The PSP scale, a validated scale that assesses personal and social functioning (Nasrallah et al, 2008;Morosini et al, 2000;Patrick et al, 2009) did not show a significant treatment difference, perhaps due to the high placebo response observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to end point (last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach: day 92 or the last postbaseline assessment in the double-blind period) in PANSS total score. Secondary efficacy variables were changes from baseline to end point in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scales (Morosini et al, 2000). Other efficacy variables included PANSS subscales, PANSS Marder factor scores, and treatment responder rate (defined as patients with a X30% decrease from baseline in PANSS total score at end point).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAF is a clinical tool contained in the handbook VADO ( Valutazione delle Abilità e Definizione degli Obiettivi –in English: Skills Assessment and Definition of Goals ), a short manual for the planning and evaluation of rehabilitative interventions22 widely used in psychiatric facilities 23. The score of each domain ranges on a 7-point scale, from 9= excellent functioning to 3= extremely severe impairment .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) was used to assess social and occupational functioning over the past month (Morosini, Magliano, Brambilla, Ugolini, & Pioli, 2000). This is an observer-rated 100-point single-item rating scale.…”
Section: Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%