2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-011-9259-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal and Social Interactions Between Young Girls and Scientists: Examining Critical Aspects for Identity Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By examining in detail how peers socially interact during a science camp, our study both supports and extends previous studies on identity outcomes that result from science camp programs (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2009;Frost & Wiest, 2007;Wheaton & Ash, 2008). Prior research studies in this area have pointed to specific identity-related outcomes for youth participating in science camp programs such as attitudes toward science (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2009), career aspirations (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2012), confidence (Frost & Wiest, 2007), and views of science and scientists (FarlandSmith, 2009;Wheaton & Ash, 2008). While our study also highlighted identity-related outcomes of a science camp program, it adds essential insight into a possible mechanism of identity development.…”
Section: Conclusion and Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…By examining in detail how peers socially interact during a science camp, our study both supports and extends previous studies on identity outcomes that result from science camp programs (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2009;Frost & Wiest, 2007;Wheaton & Ash, 2008). Prior research studies in this area have pointed to specific identity-related outcomes for youth participating in science camp programs such as attitudes toward science (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2009), career aspirations (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Farland-Smith, 2012), confidence (Frost & Wiest, 2007), and views of science and scientists (FarlandSmith, 2009;Wheaton & Ash, 2008). While our study also highlighted identity-related outcomes of a science camp program, it adds essential insight into a possible mechanism of identity development.…”
Section: Conclusion and Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…While such a description does not specifically involve gender, it nevertheless has gendered implications, as these values and traits are more consistent with a traditional masculine identity. Research finds that because of a lack of accurate information, females often view STEM occupations in this traditional and quite stereotypic perspective and, consequently, are less likely to aspire or persist to subsequent occupations (Barton, Tan, & Rivet, 2008; Brickhouse & Potter, 2001; Buck, Clark, Leslie-Pelecky, Lu, & Cerda-Lizarraga, 2008; Farland-Smith, 2012; Winn et al, 2011). Regarding engineering in particular, Reyer (2007) found that among high school students involved in an university outreach program, girls had inaccurate perceptions of engineering occupations, for example, as requiring genius levels of expertise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above, one could reasonably conclude that individuals who hold negative perceptions of science or scientists may be unlikely to pursue science courses or select science as a career. One way to address these issues is through the use of science trade books and picture books in instruction (Farland, ; Farland‐Smith, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Brien, Kopala, and Martinez-Pons (1999) linked selfefficacy to the probability of an individual choosing a career in that field. It also has implications regarding the formation of science identity in children, as noted in the work reported by Farland-Smith (2012). Science identity includes one's perception that he/she can be a successful investigator in science contexts and is viewed by others as being competent in science (Brickhouse & Potter, 2001;Carlone, 1994;Farland-Smith, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%