2013
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2013.781522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person–organization fit and employee outcomes: test of a social exchange model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
92
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with Locke's (1969) job satisfaction theory, which asserts that an employee's favorable perception based on comparison between desired expectations and true experience on the job will bring about positive emotion like job satisfaction. Further, considerable research has suggested that employees with a high degree of P-O fit derived from met expectations in regard to needs-supplies fulfillment tend to express greater organizational commitment (Edwards & Shipp, 2007;Saks & Ashforth, 1997;Kim, et al, 2013). Many studies have also reported that P-O fit is negatively related to turnover propensity among employees, making them less likely to quit (Edwards & Shipp, 2007;Kristof-Brown et al, 2005;Moynihan & Pandey, 2007;Verquer et al, 2003;).…”
Section: P-o Fit and Work Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in line with Locke's (1969) job satisfaction theory, which asserts that an employee's favorable perception based on comparison between desired expectations and true experience on the job will bring about positive emotion like job satisfaction. Further, considerable research has suggested that employees with a high degree of P-O fit derived from met expectations in regard to needs-supplies fulfillment tend to express greater organizational commitment (Edwards & Shipp, 2007;Saks & Ashforth, 1997;Kim, et al, 2013). Many studies have also reported that P-O fit is negatively related to turnover propensity among employees, making them less likely to quit (Edwards & Shipp, 2007;Kristof-Brown et al, 2005;Moynihan & Pandey, 2007;Verquer et al, 2003;).…”
Section: P-o Fit and Work Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, scholars have increasingly emphasized the need for research to move beyond merely establishing the simplistic associations between P-O fit and its work correlates (e.g., Edwards & Cable, 2009;Lee & Antonakis, 2014;Liu, Liu & Hu, 2010;Resick, Baltes & Shantz, 2007). Indeed, there are both theoretical reasons and empirical evidences to believe that the relationships between P-O fit and work outcomes may be more complex than previously thought; for example, a few studies have begun to argue that the influence of P-O fit on employees' workrelated outcomes may not be uniform for all situations, and may be contingent upon the quality of personal relationships that a focal employee develops with exchange parties through social interactions within organizations (Erdogan et al, 2004;Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Social Exchange Relationships In Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations