2008
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2008.33659871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person-Centered Work Environments in Health Care: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Framework.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the findings of this study, as predicted, shows that psychological safety affects affective commitment (H1). This evidence is in line with the research of Rathert et al, (2009). Increased psychological safety was associated with increased levels of employee commitment and engagement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the findings of this study, as predicted, shows that psychological safety affects affective commitment (H1). This evidence is in line with the research of Rathert et al, (2009). Increased psychological safety was associated with increased levels of employee commitment and engagement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A few studies have illustrated that those high in affective commitment are more likely to engage in organizationally attitudes and behaviors such as extra effort as well as proactive and innovative behaviors similar to employee voice (Strauss et al, 2009). Specifically, there is only one study by Rathert et al, (2009) which investigate the positive relationship between affective commitment and employee voice. In this context, employees experiencing psychological safety at work might feel free to be themselves and take decisions freely (Rao-Nickholson et al, 2015) through affective commitment.…”
Section: Psychological Safety -Affective Commitment -Prosocial Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hitherto there have been few empirical studies that integrate these constructs (Kara et al 2004;Rathert et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological safety means that regardless of rank in an organization, employees feel that they can point out situations that are ineffective or dangerous, and they can legitimately question decisions of others. Psychological safety has received some research attention as a focus for how the work environment can be improved, and in addition, for improving patient outcomes (Edmondson et al, 2001;Halbesleben and Rathert, 2008;Nembhard and Edmondson, 2006;Nembhard et al, 2009;Rathert et al, 2009). Given that psychological safety has been demonstrated as being important for positive health care outcomes, research must now focus on identifying elements that increase psychological safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%