2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persisting in-memory databases using SCM

Abstract: Big Data applications need to be able to access large amounts of variable data as fast as possible. Emerging Storage Class Memory (SCM) fit this need by making memory available in large capacity while making changes endure as a seamless continuation of load-store accesses through processor caches. However, when writing values into a persistent memory tier, programmers are faced with the dual problems of controlling untimely cache evictions that might commit changes prematurely, and of grouping changes and maki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AOF persistence logged each WRITE operation received by the server [31]. To avoid data loss, [32] often wrote RDB to storage class memory (SCM) and recorded updated items in SCM via AOF file. In contrast, log-based approaches were more popular than snapshot approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AOF persistence logged each WRITE operation received by the server [31]. To avoid data loss, [32] often wrote RDB to storage class memory (SCM) and recorded updated items in SCM via AOF file. In contrast, log-based approaches were more popular than snapshot approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%