2012
DOI: 10.1002/acs.2288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent tracking and identification of regime‐switching systems with structural uncertainties: unmodeled dynamics, observation bias, and nonlinear model mismatch

Abstract: SUMMARYThis work focuses on tracking and system identification of systems with regime‐switching parameters, which are modeled by a Markov process. It introduces a framework for persistent identification problems that encompass many typical system uncertainties, including parameter switching, stochastic observation disturbances, deterministic unmodeled dynamics, sensor observation bias, and nonlinear model mismatch. In accordance with the ‘frequency’ of the parameter switching process, we divide the problems in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use a simple system to verify the theoretical results by considering yk=a0uk+e1uk1+e2uk2+bk+δk+dk,where the true parameter θ=a0=9; the unmodelled dynamics ϕ~kθ~ is represented by using a finite number of terms with e1=0.3 and e2=0.2, which indicates η~=0.5; the observation bias and model mismatch are bk=false(0.2+0.1sinfalse(kfalse)false)false(k+2false)0.5 and δk=3cosukfalse(k+1false)0.22, which are consistent with Assumption 2 (see [5] for details); dk is a sequence of i.i.d. normal random variables with zero mean and standard deviation σ=25.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use a simple system to verify the theoretical results by considering yk=a0uk+e1uk1+e2uk2+bk+δk+dk,where the true parameter θ=a0=9; the unmodelled dynamics ϕ~kθ~ is represented by using a finite number of terms with e1=0.3 and e2=0.2, which indicates η~=0.5; the observation bias and model mismatch are bk=false(0.2+0.1sinfalse(kfalse)false)false(k+2false)0.5 and δk=3cosukfalse(k+1false)0.22, which are consistent with Assumption 2 (see [5] for details); dk is a sequence of i.i.d. normal random variables with zero mean and standard deviation σ=25.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biernacki et al [4] considered the problem of robust stabilisation of a linear time‐invariant system with variations of a real parameter vector. For the systems with regime‐switching parameters, Kan et al [5] proposed a framework for persistent identification problems that encompassed many typical system uncertainties, including parameter switching, stochastic observation disturbances, deterministic unmodeled dynamics, sensor observation bias and non‐linear model mismatch. Lin et al [6] discussed the robust passivity and global stabilisation problems for a class of uncertain non‐linear stochastic systems with structural uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our collaboration and from George's frequent explanations on many of his extensive works, I have gradually figured out George's great expertise in four areas: (1) stochastic approximation; (2) regime-switching systems and switching diffusion; (3) two-time-scale Markov chains; (4) stochastic delay systems. In our joint work, George's profound knowledge and fundamental contributions in these areas have been shown in many of our papers that demonstrate integration of these system features and other added characteristics [3,22,23]. In these areas and their applications, we have served on each other's PhD student committees regularly, although we are in different colleges/schools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%