2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.25.007773
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent Epigenetic Reprogramming of Sweet Taste by Diet

Abstract: Interactions between genes and environment sculpt the responses of cells to environmental stimuli. In neuronal cells this process can lead to long term changes in the behavioral repertoire of animals, which in turn impacts disease risk. Here we show that the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2.1 (PRC2.1) modulates the physiology of sweet gustatory neurons and the taste behavior of D. melanogaster fruit flies in response to the food environment. A high sugar diet caused a redistribution of PRC2.1 chromatin occupancy … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be a delayed effect of the experienced starvation stress; prolonged vibrational stress can lead to reduced voluntary locomotion (Ries et al, 2017). Another possibility could be a long-lasting or even persistent effect on sensory perception (May et al, 2019;Vaziri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a delayed effect of the experienced starvation stress; prolonged vibrational stress can lead to reduced voluntary locomotion (Ries et al, 2017). Another possibility could be a long-lasting or even persistent effect on sensory perception (May et al, 2019;Vaziri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a delayed effect of the experienced starvation stress; prolonged vibrational stress can lead to reduced voluntary locomotion (Ries et al, 2017). Another possibility could be a long-lasting or even chronic effect on sensory perception (May et al, 2019;Vaziri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%