2014
DOI: 10.5539/esr.v4n1p31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent Effects of Chemicals Used to Control Shrub Densification in Semi-Arid Savanna

Abstract: Mokala National Park (MoNP) was proclaimed in 2007 in an area that used to be managed as a commercial wildlife and hunting farm, and prior to 2003 as a cattle and goat farm. The vegetation comprises sparse to closed woodlands and shrublands of the Savanna Biome. Shrub densification was deemed undesirable in the context of commercial farming where management objectives were to maximise production of grazing animals and to promote visibility of wildlife to tourists and hunters. Accordingly, previous landowners h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A. mellifera, on the other hand, requires exceptionally good rainfall in order to produce large crops of viable seed, while seeds may be absent, sterile or highly predated in years with low or moderate rainfall (Joubert et al 2013;Bezuidenhout et al, 2015). This possibly explains why we do not see a recovery in A. mellifera numbers within the time frame of this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…A. mellifera, on the other hand, requires exceptionally good rainfall in order to produce large crops of viable seed, while seeds may be absent, sterile or highly predated in years with low or moderate rainfall (Joubert et al 2013;Bezuidenhout et al, 2015). This possibly explains why we do not see a recovery in A. mellifera numbers within the time frame of this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Due to the global nature of some of the determinants of woody encroachment, as well as the legacy of historical land‐use practises, the options available to managers to prevent or reverse the process are limited. Mechanical (Brudvig & Asbjornsen ) or chemical (Bezuidenhout, Kraaij & Baard ) control methods are sometimes employed, but are expensive, unfeasible over large areas and often ecologically undesirable. An alternative is to manipulate and actively manage the locally controllable determinants, by reducing grazing pressure, increasing browsing and promoting an appropriate fire regime (Staver et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various localized management interventions are implemented to reduce woody cover encroachment. These include mechanical clearing, poisoning of woody plants (sometimes through aerial spraying) (Bezuidenhout et al 2015) or changed fire regimes (increased fire intensity and frequency) (Smit et al 2016). Even though these interventions may sometimes be successful at a local scale in reducing woody cover, there are trade-offs, and they may have to be continuously repeated since the driver of change (i.e., increased carbon dioxide) is not addressed (Table 3).…”
Section: Current Management Options and The Nffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, aerial poisoning on savanna systems was identified as the only management option negatively impacting nature for its potential to remove non-target species (Bezuidenhout et al 2015). In some cases, benefits will be context dependent within the NN component.…”
Section: Cross-case Study Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%