“…An alternative explanation is therefore that the virus has established latency in long-lived T cells. As with the case described by Vossen et al, the particularly high initial viral load (>10 5 copies/ml), compared with the typical initial viral load in immunocompetent individuals (10 3 -10 5 copies/ml, 3,8 ), may have resulted in a sufficient number of long-lived T cells becoming latently infected with VZV, such that DNA remained detectable by PCR. If this were correct, the loss of detectable viral DNA would then be dependent upon the clearance of latently infected lymphocytes from the circulation by natural turnover.…”