2022
DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent contact dermatitis following use of laurel oil

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8 A biopsy of the patch test reaction showed EM features in one. 8 After reviewing the remaining reports, in some cases we identified coalescing urticarial papules 9,10,12 ; lesions likely triggered by pressure, 12 which could be due to koebnerization as described in EM; or pigmentation, 4,5 which may be a sign of cytotoxic epidermal damage. Clear-cut target-like EM-lesions were not, however, described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,8 A biopsy of the patch test reaction showed EM features in one. 8 After reviewing the remaining reports, in some cases we identified coalescing urticarial papules 9,10,12 ; lesions likely triggered by pressure, 12 which could be due to koebnerization as described in EM; or pigmentation, 4,5 which may be a sign of cytotoxic epidermal damage. Clear-cut target-like EM-lesions were not, however, described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We reviewed the English literature regarding allergic CD to bay leaf-based products from 2000 to 2023 and identified 10 cases in 10 publications [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] (Table S1). Seven were female.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%