2019
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.211235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence with generic imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a matched cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While majority of studies have shown that generic and innovator imatinib are equally efficacious 15 , a few have suggested loss of responses when switched from innovator to generic version of imatinib 8 . Besides, certain studies have also suggested that medication persistence may be lower with generic imatinib, mainly driven by excessive adverse events as compared to innovator 19 . Persistence on a given TKI for more than three years and attainment of DMR - both are pre-requisites for TFR trial; therefore, a TFR study on generic imatinib potentially addressees both tolerability and efficacy controversies that surround generic imatinib use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While majority of studies have shown that generic and innovator imatinib are equally efficacious 15 , a few have suggested loss of responses when switched from innovator to generic version of imatinib 8 . Besides, certain studies have also suggested that medication persistence may be lower with generic imatinib, mainly driven by excessive adverse events as compared to innovator 19 . Persistence on a given TKI for more than three years and attainment of DMR - both are pre-requisites for TFR trial; therefore, a TFR study on generic imatinib potentially addressees both tolerability and efficacy controversies that surround generic imatinib use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a Canadian prospective matched cohort study analyzed the rate of persistence with generic and branded imatinib: a 3-year rate of persistence with the generic was significantly inferior to that of the branded imatinib (72.8% vs. 88.2%; P=0.03), with a probability of switching, which was two-fold higher for generic than for branded imatinib. Among patients who opted for the generic drug, 25 (69.5%) had to switch for intolerance and 12 (33.3%) for resistance [23]. With increasing data demonstrating comparable efficacy of generic imatinib, it is reasonable to expect that similar data may be obtained in case of discontinuation of the generic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uyanik MS et al [12], Klil-Drori AJ et al [13] ont montré une aggravation des effets secondaires après le passage de la molécule d'origine au générique. Chez les patients initialement mis sous générique, Abdalla Awidi et al ont montré que 89 % ont eu des effets secondaires dont 13,5 % sont de grade 3 et 4 [14].…”
Section: Page14unclassified