2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.291372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence in Style-Adjusted Mutual Fund Returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are therefore able to conclude that the performance variation between the winner and loser portfolios cannot be explained by asset pricing models that are consistent with insatiability and risk aversion. These results, although obtained with a different risk adjustment approach, are similar to those reported in Teo and Woo (2001) for American mutual funds, where return persistence is observed to increase after style adjustment.…”
Section: Persistence In Style-adjusted Returnssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We are therefore able to conclude that the performance variation between the winner and loser portfolios cannot be explained by asset pricing models that are consistent with insatiability and risk aversion. These results, although obtained with a different risk adjustment approach, are similar to those reported in Teo and Woo (2001) for American mutual funds, where return persistence is observed to increase after style adjustment.…”
Section: Persistence In Style-adjusted Returnssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Pomorski (2004) also asserts that style returns may carry information about the skill of fund managers. In line with Teo and Woo (2001), our results show that the winner portfolio stochastically dominates the loser portfolio, both for the full sample and for all of the sub samples grouped by geographical scope of investment objective.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations