2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0096-3003(01)00111-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence and global stability in a delayed predator–prey system with Michaelis–Menten type functional response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Proposition 6 we can see that the solution of system (1) and (3) is bounded, and so are the derivatives of ( − * ) ( = 1, 2, 3) by the equations in (1). Applying Lemma 1, we obtain that…”
Section: Theorem 8 Assume Thatmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Proposition 6 we can see that the solution of system (1) and (3) is bounded, and so are the derivatives of ( − * ) ( = 1, 2, 3) by the equations in (1). Applying Lemma 1, we obtain that…”
Section: Theorem 8 Assume Thatmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For example, the predator-prey system for three species with Michaelis-Menten type functional response was studied by many authors [1][2][3][4]. However, the systems in [1][2][3][4] are either with discrete delay or without delay or without diffusion. In view of individuals taking time to move, spatial dispersal was dealt with by introducing diffusion term to corresponding delayed ODE model in previous literatures, namely, adding a Laplacian term to the ODE model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of global stability is studied by many authors in the predator-prey systems with delay [Beretta & Kuang, 1998;Xu & Chaplain, 2002;Aziz Alaoui & Daher Okiye, 2003].…”
Section: Introduction and Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (1.1), it has been assumed that the prey grows logistically with growth rate r 1 (t) and carrying capacity r 1 (t)/a 11 (t) in the absence of predation. The predator consumes the prey according to the functional response f (t, x 1 (t)) and grows logistically with growth rate r 2 (t) and carrying capacity x 1 (t)/a 21 (t) proportional to the population size of the prey (or prey abundance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many authors have explored the dynamics of predator-prey systems with Holling type functional responses [1,3,4,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14]. Furthermore, some authors [15,16] have also described a type IV functional response that is humped and that declines at high prey densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%