1997
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1997.8663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence and Evolution of Feline Coronavirus in a Closed Cat-Breeding Colony

Abstract: Feline coronavirus (FCoV) persistence and evolution were studied in a closed cat-breeding facility with an endemic serotype I FCoV infection. Viral RNA was detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the feces and/or plasma of 36 of 42 cats (86%) tested. Of 5 cats, identified as FCoV shedders during the initial survey, 4 had detectable viral RNA in the feces when tested 111 days later. To determine whether this was due to continuous reinfection or to viral persistence, 2 cats were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
166
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(12 reference statements)
15
166
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immune response to FCoV, though inadequate to sterilize the infection (FCoV-specific antibody titers were modest and remained low throughout the chronic infection), is vigorous enough to enforce immune system and to prevent infection by antigenically related FCoVs. To support this observation, a previous study 14 regarding coronavirus epidemiology, persistence, and evolution in a closed cat-breeding facility with an endemic FCoV infection reported that the virus involved was a serotype I strain and that some cats, previously identified as shedders, still had detectable viral RNA in their feces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immune response to FCoV, though inadequate to sterilize the infection (FCoV-specific antibody titers were modest and remained low throughout the chronic infection), is vigorous enough to enforce immune system and to prevent infection by antigenically related FCoVs. To support this observation, a previous study 14 regarding coronavirus epidemiology, persistence, and evolution in a closed cat-breeding facility with an endemic FCoV infection reported that the virus involved was a serotype I strain and that some cats, previously identified as shedders, still had detectable viral RNA in their feces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several authors have demonstrated that the virus persists in the intestine of healthy cats and may be excreted over a period of months or even years. 11,13,14 These cats represent the coronavirus reservoir, and some of them can develop a fatal immune-mediated disease called feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). 8 Since FCoVs are ubiquitous pathogens, the evaluation of anti-FCoV antibodies can be useful to monitor infection in a breeding cattery and/or an FCoV-free household.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar pattern was observed in a previous study that also examined the M gene (CHANG; EGBERINK; ROTTIER, 2011) which determined that FIPVs originate from FECVs by the accumulation and selection of point mutations (POLAND et al, 1996;VENNEMA et al, 1998;PEDERSEN et al, 2009). The internal mutation hypothesis has been widely accepted and is mainly supported by the close similarities between FECoV and FIPV and the low incidence of FIP outbreaks, despite the high proportion of FCoV-seropositive cats (SPARKES; GRUFFYDD-JONES; HERREWEGH et al, 1997;HOLST et al, 2006;PRATELLI, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no disease-specific clusters of FCoVs were found, samples from Cat 6 were particularly informative, as two different strains of FCoV, one enteric and one systemic, can be clearly observed in Figure 1 Catteries and closed multi-cat environments usually have one major enzootic strain of coronavirus that persists over long periods of time, and these major enzootic strains are dominant even with exposure to other strains (POLAND et al, 1996;HERREWEGH et al, 1997;VENNEMA et al, 1998;ADDIE et al, 2003;PEDERSEN et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation