2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peroral delivery of insulin using chitosan derivatives: A comparative study of polyelectrolyte nanocomplexes and nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it was observed that PEC with TMC and PEG-graft-TMC copolymer were more stable in SIF and could efficiently protect insulin from proteolytic enzymes when compared to the NPs (72). Despite this drawback, other researchers have continued their investigation on CS derivatives for NP preparation for oral delivery of therapeutic agents.…”
Section: Trimethyl Chitosanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it was observed that PEC with TMC and PEG-graft-TMC copolymer were more stable in SIF and could efficiently protect insulin from proteolytic enzymes when compared to the NPs (72). Despite this drawback, other researchers have continued their investigation on CS derivatives for NP preparation for oral delivery of therapeutic agents.…”
Section: Trimethyl Chitosanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited solubility has prevented its widespread use. 9,10 The mucoadhesive and absorption-promoting properties of chitosan have been extensively evaluated. The positive charge gained in acidic pH conditions, in which chitosan has high solubility, appears to be effective for enhanced absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals fasted for another 0.5 h, then the small intestine (jejunum) was recovered and frozen in liquid nitrogen in the presence of tissue-freezing medium OCT (VWR, Atlanta, GA). The frozen tissues were sectioned into 10 mm thick specimens using a Leica 3050 microtome, then observed by CLSM (Jintapattanakit et al, 2007;Zou et al, 2010;Sonia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Determination Of Ins Absorbed By Intestine Ex Vivo and In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%