2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3235-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutation Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 545 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This additional test consisted of repeating 1000 times the same classification procedure but using random labels. In this way we were able to estimate the probability that an accuracy rate was obtained by chance (Good, 2000). A p -value was then computed as the number of repeats where the accuracy obtained with the random labels was larger than that obtained with the true labels, divided by 1000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This additional test consisted of repeating 1000 times the same classification procedure but using random labels. In this way we were able to estimate the probability that an accuracy rate was obtained by chance (Good, 2000). A p -value was then computed as the number of repeats where the accuracy obtained with the random labels was larger than that obtained with the true labels, divided by 1000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collected in the present report represent repeated measurements (for lumen diameter eight measurements points, for blood¯ow velocity six measurement points, see Figs 1 and 2). For the comparison of repeated measurements a summary statistic as area under the curve (AUC) is often recommended (Crowder, 1990;Good, 2000). Therefore, in the present analysis all measurement points from 0 to 170 s (n 8 for lumen diameter), and from 0 to 180 s (n 6 for blood¯ow velocity) were used to calculate the AUC for each subject and each experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the present analysis all measurement points from 0 to 170 s (n 8 for lumen diameter), and from 0 to 180 s (n 6 for blood¯ow velocity) were used to calculate the AUC for each subject and each experiment. By use of a nonparametric test for paired comparisons, not based on ranks but original values (Good, 2000), the P-values were calculated exactly. Lumen diameter 120 s after cuff de¯ation was prespeci®ed for analysis according to results in a previous paper (Wendelhag et al, 1999), and therefore a P-value was calculated also for this measurement point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In synthesizing randomized clinical trials, their idea is based on the rerandomization argument considering that the active treatment and control groups within a trial form a "pair." Further, their idea can be more generally interpreted as an adaptation of the one-sample permutation test based on the symmetric assumptions of test statistics around the null value (Good, 2000). First, we developed an extended exact permutation method for joint inference of the grand mean vector μ of the multivariate random-effects model (*).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%