2006
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutation testing of orthogonal factorial effects in a language‐processing experiment using fMRI

Abstract: The block-paradigm of the Functional Image Analysis Contest (FIAC) dataset was analysed with the Brain Activation and Morphological Mapping software. Permutation methods in the wavelet domain were used for inference on cluster-based test statistics of orthogonal contrasts relevant to the factorial design of the study, namely: the average response across all active blocks, the main effect of speaker, the main effect of sentence, and the interaction between sentence and speaker. Extensive activation was seen wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess our primary hypothesis of white matter abnormalities in OCD patients in relation to healthy comparison subjects, differences between patients and comparison subjects were estimated by fitting an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model at each voxel in standard space within the white matter mask. The null hypothesis of no difference in fractional anisotropy between patients and comparison subjects (N=30 per group) was tested with permutation at the level of three-dimensional, spatially contiguous voxel clusters, as described in detail elsewhere (41,42). For each between-group comparison, we used probability thresholds for cluster-level testing (p<0.017), adjusted such that the average number of false positive tests was <1.…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess our primary hypothesis of white matter abnormalities in OCD patients in relation to healthy comparison subjects, differences between patients and comparison subjects were estimated by fitting an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model at each voxel in standard space within the white matter mask. The null hypothesis of no difference in fractional anisotropy between patients and comparison subjects (N=30 per group) was tested with permutation at the level of three-dimensional, spatially contiguous voxel clusters, as described in detail elsewhere (41,42). For each between-group comparison, we used probability thresholds for cluster-level testing (p<0.017), adjusted such that the average number of false positive tests was <1.…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the processing pipeline are given in the Supporting Information. In brief, following spatial and temporal correction for participant motion and removal of the global signal, a regression of the general linear model [Suckling et al, 2006] estimated the contrast of one-back and two-back working memory active task blocks versus zero-back blocks. Maps of the estimated responses, b (linear model coefficients), and standardized responses, b/SE(b), (i.e.…”
Section: Task-activated (Working Memory) Fmri Acquisition and Preprocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps of the estimated responses, b (linear model coefficients), and standardized responses, b/SE(b), (i.e. model coefficients divided by their standard errors; a t-statistic) were registered into MNI stereotactic space by an affine transformation maximizing the intra-cerebral correlation between the image and the ''EPI'' template (available at: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) [Suckling et al, 2006].…”
Section: Task-activated (Working Memory) Fmri Acquisition and Preprocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, voxel-wise statistical analysis of grey matter images was undertaken in Cambridge Brain Analysis [23,24,27,28] using a cluster-based approach and permutation inference with a probabilistic threshold for significance corrected for multiple comparisons by family-wise error level of p < 0.001, with less than 1 false-positive cluster. Montreal Neurological Institute co-ordinates observed were converted to Talairach co-ordinates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%