2019
DOI: 10.3390/e21101013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutation Entropy: Enhancing Discriminating Power by Using Relative Frequencies Vector of Ordinal Patterns Instead of Their Shannon Entropy

Abstract: Many measures to quantify the nonlinear dynamics of a time series are based on estimating the probability of certain features from their relative frequencies. Once a normalised histogram of events is computed, a single result is usually derived. This process can be broadly viewed as a nonlinear I R n mapping into I R , where n is the number of bins in the histogram. However, this mapping might entail a loss of information that could be critical for time series classification purposes. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification accuracy achieved with SlopEn was the highest in all cases tested ( Table 1 ). Since the datasets were chosen from previous works where PE exhibited some limitations due to its inability to include amplitude information [ 33 , 42 ], its results were the worst of the three metrics, as expected. PE only found significant differences for EEG and EMG records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification accuracy achieved with SlopEn was the highest in all cases tested ( Table 1 ). Since the datasets were chosen from previous works where PE exhibited some limitations due to its inability to include amplitude information [ 33 , 42 ], its results were the worst of the three metrics, as expected. PE only found significant differences for EEG and EMG records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Two of the most used entropy quantification methods were included in the experiments for comparative purposes: PE, as a good representative of ordinal–based approaches, and SampEn, based on amplitude differences. The experimental dataset included usual biomedical records in classification studies: EEG and RR records, records where PE achieved very good classification accuracy, EMG records, and synthetic and real records where PE has failed because amplitude information was a key distinguishing feature: Gaussian and uniform random noise [ 42 ], and energy consumption records [ 33 ]. This way, the study was also not constrained to just biomedical records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the addition of synthetic databases was considered, since this kind of records is also very useful for characterising the performances of methods under more controlled conditions. In a very recent paper [ 32 ], we proposed to use a hidden Markov model to create synthetic records based on transition probabilities of their ordinal patterns of length . This is a very suitable tool to create a synthetic dataset for the present study, since the main difference between PE1 and PE2 is the use of the number of actual ordinal patterns found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… being the transition probability between consecutive states and at time t , , and the following correspondence between model states and ordinal patterns: , , , , , and , 100 records of two synthetic classes were generated using this model. For one class, the transition probabilities were , and for the second class , probabilities defined as in [ 32 ]. Therefore, each class penalised a different transition, and that would impact the number of patterns found at and beyond in a different way for each class, since the model is not symmetric (see details in [ 32 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%