2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.00368
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permutation-based true discovery proportions for fMRI cluster analysis

Abstract: We develop a general permutation-based closed testing method to compute a simultaneous lower confidence bound for the true discovery proportions of all possible subsets of a hypothesis testing problem. It is particularly useful in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging cluster analysis, where it is of interest to select a cluster of voxels and to provide a confidence statement on the percentage of truly activated voxels within that cluster, avoiding the well-known spatial specificity paradox. We offer a user-fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting perspective of this work is to compare the performance of other templates. Our experience in DE studies indicates that improving on the Simes family is challenging; similar conclusions have been reported in Andreella et al (2020) for the analysis of fMRI data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting perspective of this work is to compare the performance of other templates. Our experience in DE studies indicates that improving on the Simes family is challenging; similar conclusions have been reported in Andreella et al (2020) for the analysis of fMRI data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…• A closely related approach called pARI has recently been proposed by Andreella et al (2020) for the analysis of neuroimaging data. It is implemented in the R package pARI.…”
Section: Existing Post Hoc Inference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is then to sign-flip differences between paired observations. For additional discussions and applications, see Efron 1969;Bekker and Lawford 2008;Davidson and Flachaire 2008;Winkler et al 2014;Andreella et al 2020. This setting is highly convenient to work with, which allows us to illustrate our proposed methodology.…”
Section: Properties Of An Oracle Subgroup-invariance Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original data are available at https://openfmri. org and we used the pre-prosessed data from Andreella (2021) (for details see Smeets et al, 2013;Andreella et al, 2020). The dataset contains measurements for n = 29 subjects who interchangeably looked a images of food and non-food.…”
Section: • Tests With M = 4nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation