2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.265.01.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permo-Carboniferous climate: Early Pennsylvanian to Late Permian climate development of central Europe in a regional and global context

Abstract: A well-justified stratigraphical correlation of continental successions and new palaeogeographic reconstruction of Pangaea reveal new insights into the northern Pangaean climate development influenced by palaeogeography, palaeotopography, glacio-eustatic sealevel changes and ocean currents. The overall Permo-Carboniferous aridization trend was interrupted by five wet phases. These are linked to the Gondwana icecap. The aridization and weakening of wet phases over time were not only caused by the drift of north… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
4
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These oscillations are, however, superimposed on a shift to "drier" conditions in equatorial Pangea during later Pennsylvanian time (Roscher and Schneider, 2006;Tabor and Poulsen, 2008), when the Monongahela Formation and lower Dunkard were deposited. A consequence of this longer-term shift is that in continental basins of the US and Europe the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary, no matter how it is defined (paleontologically or by absolute age dates), is lithologically gradational, to the point of being described as "indistinct".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These oscillations are, however, superimposed on a shift to "drier" conditions in equatorial Pangea during later Pennsylvanian time (Roscher and Schneider, 2006;Tabor and Poulsen, 2008), when the Monongahela Formation and lower Dunkard were deposited. A consequence of this longer-term shift is that in continental basins of the US and Europe the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary, no matter how it is defined (paleontologically or by absolute age dates), is lithologically gradational, to the point of being described as "indistinct".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant distribution, both of individual species and of species pools, strongly reflects the interplay of climatic and local habitat conditions (e.g., see many references to this in DiMichele et al, 2008;Roscher and Schneider, 2006). As a consequence, it is essential that biostratigraphic schemes be established on the basis of species pools with ecological and evolutionary continuity in space and time, the plants living under similar climatic and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of a clear hiatus at the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary is seen in other terrestrial sections from Western Europe (Roscher and Schneider, 2006), through the Dunkard Group in the Appalachians (Fedorko and Skema, 2011;Martin, 1998), to the southwestern United States (Condon, 1997). In mixed terrestrialmarine sections, such as in the Midcontinent United States (Sawin et al, 2006), there is evidence of continuous cyclothemic deposition across the boundary, again not indicative of a major physical hiatus (Olszewski and Patzkowsky, 2003;Mazzullo et al, 2007).…”
Section: Onset Of "Big Ice"mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The physical and biological dynamics of this time were superimposed on the complex low-latitude landscape where a vast amount of Pennsylvanian peat formed (e.g., Cecil et al, 2003a;Cleal et al, 2009;Gastaldo et al, 1993;Greb et al, 1999Greb et al, , 2003Greb et al, , 2008Staub, 2002). The Euramerican portion of this landscape included the Variscan-Appalachian mountain ranges, subparallel to the equator (OpluĆĄtil and Cleal, 2007), creating large areas of both cratonic and intermontane basins for peat formation in Europe and southeastern Canada (Bashforth et al, 2010;Calder, 1994;OpluĆĄtil and Cleal, 2007;Piedad-SĂĄnchez et al, 2004;Roscher and Schneider, 2006), and the large cratonic basins in the United States, in which many of the major coal beds, particularly in the Middle Pennsylvanian, developed on flat landscapes often of vast areal extent (Belt et al, 2011;Calder and Gibling, 1994;Cecil et al, 1985Cecil et al, , 2003bGreb et al, 2003;Heckel, 1995Heckel, , 2008Staub, 2002). Climatic fluctuations, sea-level fluctuations, changes in siliciclastic sediment flux, and the formation of peat and limestone, were not independent variables (Cecil and Dulong, 2003).…”
Section: Pennsylvanian Coal and Sequence Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%