2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permittivity and density of the systems (monoglyme, diglyme, triglyme, or tetraglyme+n-heptane) at several temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), l Ref, 46 m Ref, 47 n Ref, 48 o Ref 49 (densities and viscosities of monoglyme at 308.15 K and 318.15 K were also reported), p Ref, 50 q Ref, 51 r Ref 52 (this reference also reported dielectric constant of 7.62 as well as refractive index and molar refraction for triglyme), s Ref, 53 t Ref 54 , u Ref, 55 v density data for monoglyme and diglyme were reported at temperatures between 293.15 K and 353.15 K and up to 60 MPa, 56 w Ref, 57 x Ref, 58 y Ref 59 (density data at 288.18 and 308.15 K were also reported), z Ref, 60 aa Ref, 61 bb Ref 62 (densities and viscosities were reported for several glymes from 288.15 K to 343.15 K), cc Ref, 63 dd Ref, 64 ee Ref, 65 ff Ref, 66 gg Ref 67 (densities, kinematic viscosities and heat capacities were reported for several glymes including pentaethylene glycol dimethyl ether from 283.15 to 423.15 K), hh Ref 68 (data on density, isentropic compressibility and isothermal compressibility of triglyme and tetraglyme were reported at 293.15–353.15 K and 0.1–100 MPa), ii Ref, 69 jj Ref, 70 kk Ref, 71 ll Ref, 72 mm Ref (densities, refractive indexes, and boiling points of other 1,2-disubstituted ethylene glycol derivatives such as propyl glyme were also reported), 73 nn Ref, 74 …”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…), l Ref, 46 m Ref, 47 n Ref, 48 o Ref 49 (densities and viscosities of monoglyme at 308.15 K and 318.15 K were also reported), p Ref, 50 q Ref, 51 r Ref 52 (this reference also reported dielectric constant of 7.62 as well as refractive index and molar refraction for triglyme), s Ref, 53 t Ref 54 , u Ref, 55 v density data for monoglyme and diglyme were reported at temperatures between 293.15 K and 353.15 K and up to 60 MPa, 56 w Ref, 57 x Ref, 58 y Ref 59 (density data at 288.18 and 308.15 K were also reported), z Ref, 60 aa Ref, 61 bb Ref 62 (densities and viscosities were reported for several glymes from 288.15 K to 343.15 K), cc Ref, 63 dd Ref, 64 ee Ref, 65 ff Ref, 66 gg Ref 67 (densities, kinematic viscosities and heat capacities were reported for several glymes including pentaethylene glycol dimethyl ether from 283.15 to 423.15 K), hh Ref 68 (data on density, isentropic compressibility and isothermal compressibility of triglyme and tetraglyme were reported at 293.15–353.15 K and 0.1–100 MPa), ii Ref, 69 jj Ref, 70 kk Ref, 71 ll Ref, 72 mm Ref (densities, refractive indexes, and boiling points of other 1,2-disubstituted ethylene glycol derivatives such as propyl glyme were also reported), 73 nn Ref, 74 …”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Zhang et al compared the performance of standard dioxolane/dimethoxyethane (DOL/DME)‐based electrolytes (with LiNO 3 as the cosalt) with DOL/TMU and found a better performance, particularly, in terms of capacity utilization . We chose to make use of TMU as the solvent due to its reported stability against sulfur and its dielectric constant of 23.06–23.60, which is higher compared with the glymes (7–8), and therefore, TMU should be able to dissolve more (poly)sulfides. The physicochemical characterization (electrochemical stability window [ESW], conductivity, and viscosity) of the TMU electrolyte is discussed in Section .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A temperature increase leads to an exponential decay in viscosity which is much stronger in case of the TMU electrolyte, hence being a likely reason for the more strongly increasing conductivity. Note that both solvents differ also strongly in their relative permittivity which is 7.40 for 2G and 23.06–23.60 for TMU. The density of the different electrolyte solutions is shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative permittivity for each mixture is described as a function of the ideal volume fraction of the alkane, /, and temperature, T, by the following double-polynomial expression [40]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%