1941
DOI: 10.1061/taceat.0005384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permissible Composition and Concentration of Irrigation Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

1949
1949
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data suitability is tested using KMO (> 0.5) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (p < 0.05) before implementing PCA, and tests outcome were satisfactory for PCA (Kim et al 2016). We are selected the principal Table 5 The values calculated of relative weight ( W i ) of various irrigation water quality parameters and the permissible standard values notified by to (Kelley 1941;Richards 1954;Wilcox 1955;SZABOLCS 1964;Todd and Mays 1980;Ayers and Westcot 1985;WHO 2011) All parameter unit in meq/l except for EC (µmhos/cm), NO 3 in (mg/l) and pH (dimensionless)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data suitability is tested using KMO (> 0.5) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (p < 0.05) before implementing PCA, and tests outcome were satisfactory for PCA (Kim et al 2016). We are selected the principal Table 5 The values calculated of relative weight ( W i ) of various irrigation water quality parameters and the permissible standard values notified by to (Kelley 1941;Richards 1954;Wilcox 1955;SZABOLCS 1964;Todd and Mays 1980;Ayers and Westcot 1985;WHO 2011) All parameter unit in meq/l except for EC (µmhos/cm), NO 3 in (mg/l) and pH (dimensionless)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the W i Q i is the sub-index value of the ith water quality parameter, W i is the relative weight associated with the ith parameter, and Q i is the quality rating scale for each parameter. Q i is estimated by the ratio of the monitored concentration of ith parameter to its respective permissible value for irrigation uses according to (Kelley 1941;Richards 1954;Wilcox 1955;SZABOLCS 1964;Todd and Mays 1980;Ayers and Westcot 1985; WHO 2011) (Table 5), and the results multiplied by 100 as Eq. 4.…”
Section: Equal Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sodium measured against total calcium and magnesium is considered as Kelly's ratio (KR). KR of above (KR>1) indicates an excess level of sodium in waters (Kelly, 1940). Therefore, waters with a KR of <1 is fit for irrigation, while waters those with KR<1 are unfit for irrigation (Sundaray et al 2009).…”
Section: Kelly's Ratio (Kr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnesium ratio was calculated by using Eq. ( 4 Kelly's Ratio (KR) Kelly (1940) classified irrigation water quality according to the concentrations of Na + , Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ ions. The Kelly's ratio of equal to or less than 1 is express of good quality water for irrigation whereas above 1 is indicate of unsuitability for irrigation water due to alkali hazards (Karanth, 1987).…”
Section: Magnesium Ratio (Mr)mentioning
confidence: 99%