2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability variation and anisotropy of gas hydrate-bearing pressure-core sediments recovered from the Krishna–Godavari Basin, offshore India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The examination of hydrate cores under laboratory conditions provides insights into the hydrate properties and overall behaviour during formation and dissociation [14]. A persistent issue in artificial samples is the spatial heterogeneity of hydrate in the core [15,20,24,26], as there is evidence that it can affect the production behaviour exhibited during laboratory experiments of dissociation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The examination of hydrate cores under laboratory conditions provides insights into the hydrate properties and overall behaviour during formation and dissociation [14]. A persistent issue in artificial samples is the spatial heterogeneity of hydrate in the core [15,20,24,26], as there is evidence that it can affect the production behaviour exhibited during laboratory experiments of dissociation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires knowledge gleaned from studies at different scales, i.e., at pore- [7][8][9], core- [10,11] and reservoir-scale [12,13]. The examination of hydrate cores under laboratory conditions provides insights into the hydrate growth habits, the thermophysical properties of the hydrate-medium complex system, and of the overall behaviour during formation/dissociation, all critical in understanding and designing the production process [14]. The importance of these laboratory tests cannot be over-emphasized, but such studies are severely hampered by the difficulty of forming/procuring samples representative of hydrate-bearing media under field conditions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in pressure core technology and downhole techniques to directly measure the permeability of natural hydrate‐bearing sediments (Fujii et al, 2015; Jang et al, 2019; Kleinberg et al, 2003; Konno et al, 2015; Priest et al, 2015; Santamarina et al, 2015; Yoneda et al, 2019) have provided new insights as well as interpretive challenges. Measured permeability in collocational cores varies depending on the measurement techniques (Dai et al, 2017; Fujii et al, 2015), in part because these methods measure permeability in different directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to experiments, some researchers rely on fitting empirical relative permeability models (Joseph et al, ) to pore network modeling results (Kang et al, ; Katagiri et al, ; Mahabadi & Jang, ; Mahabadi, Dai, et al, , Mahabadi, Zheng et al, ; Wang et al, ), which, although useful, is limited by the lack of mechanistic models to describe petrophysical properties in addition to the computational expense required in developing a new pore network model for each scenario. The empirical relative permeability models used in pore network modeling, particle‐based 3‐D packs (Katagiri et al, , ), or otherwise (Yoneda et al, ) essentially involve fitting relative permeability curve separately for each hydrate saturation, which gives different model parameters for each hydrate saturation. The major drawback of these empirical models, besides several other limitations as discussed in Singh et al (), is that they rely on fitted parameters for relative permeability and capillary pressure functions at studied gas hydrate saturation to predict relative permeability and capillary pressure at other gas hydrate saturations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%