Rock Physics and Natural Hazards 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0346-0122-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability Prediction for Low Porosity Rocks by Mobile NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, this susceptibility threshold will shift to smaller values for NMR experiments at higher Larmor frequencies and vice versa. These considerations concur with observations from laboratory studies on low‐porosity reservoir rocks (Pape et al, 2009). In practice, to estimate the pore‐size‐dependent effective surface relaxivity by inverse modeling, the susceptibility and porosity (e.g., NMR porosity) of the rock sample need to be independently measured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, this susceptibility threshold will shift to smaller values for NMR experiments at higher Larmor frequencies and vice versa. These considerations concur with observations from laboratory studies on low‐porosity reservoir rocks (Pape et al, 2009). In practice, to estimate the pore‐size‐dependent effective surface relaxivity by inverse modeling, the susceptibility and porosity (e.g., NMR porosity) of the rock sample need to be independently measured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Simulations of transverse NMR relaxometry data support previous observations (e.g., Pape et al, 2009) indicating that the use of T 2 distributions as a permeability estimator tends to overestimate the contribution of smaller pores and thus to underestimate the rock permeability. To compensate for this drawback, the concept of an enhanced transverse surface relaxivity parameter that depends on pore size and rock susceptibility was introduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, surface relaxivity is not only related to the lithology type or surface roughness, but also to different elements such as surface chemistry. Pape et al 22 suggested that surface relaxivity increases with a decrease in the pore radius. However, the relationships between the three properties (grain size, specific surface, and surface relaxivity) do not follow a distinctive trend or correlation of neither linear, power, nor exponential type.…”
Section: Nmr Surface Relaxivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pape et al [11] identified a relationship between the porosity and permeability of Rotliegend sandstone from a large dataset of experimental test results: k = 3 10 × 10 −11 ϕ + 7 46 × 10 −09 ϕ 2 + 1 91ϕ 10 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%