Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1991
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5983(91)90053-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability of a fracture with cylindrical asperities

Abstract: The permeability of a rock fracture that is modeled as two smooth, parallel faces propped open by randomly located, uniformly sized cyclindrical asperities, is investigated. The viscous resistance due to the asperities is accounted for by an in-plane permeability coefficient, and a Brinkman-type equation is used to find the velocity distribution across the thickness of the fracture. The resulting simple closed-form expression for the permeability of the fracture reduces to the known result for flow between par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar et al (1991) investigated fluid flow between two parallel plane walls with randomly distributed, monodisperse cylindrical obstacles, which were considered as an analog of contact areas in natural rock fractures. Kumar et al (1991) investigated fluid flow between two parallel plane walls with randomly distributed, monodisperse cylindrical obstacles, which were considered as an analog of contact areas in natural rock fractures.…”
Section: 1002/2017jb014509mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kumar et al (1991) investigated fluid flow between two parallel plane walls with randomly distributed, monodisperse cylindrical obstacles, which were considered as an analog of contact areas in natural rock fractures. Kumar et al (1991) investigated fluid flow between two parallel plane walls with randomly distributed, monodisperse cylindrical obstacles, which were considered as an analog of contact areas in natural rock fractures.…”
Section: 1002/2017jb014509mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 compares the numerically determined fracture permeabilities Darin and Huitt (1960), Lee (1969), Walsh (1981), and Kumar et al (1991), and the dashed lines give the effective permeability calculated using the differential effective medium (DEM) model developed based on the drag force formula from Spielman and Goren (1968). Between an empty fracture and an obstacle fraction of f = 0.3 the transmissivity drops 2 orders of magnitude, then again almost 2 orders of magnitude between f = 0.3 and f = 0.7 and almost an order of magnitude between f = 0.7 and f = 0.8.…”
Section: Effective Transmissivity Of a Fracture With Obstacles-numerimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fracture, we will use the characteristic curves that were derived by of the hydrological parameters for the fracture are taken to be k =5.5 x 10-m (per fracture), S , = 1.0, S, =O.O, va =-1.65 x lo3 Pa, and n =2.89. If the permeability b2/12 of a smooth-walled channel is modified to account for fracture roughness and contact area (see Kumar et al, 1991;Zimmerman et al, 1991cZimmerman et al, ,1992, this single--27 -fracture permeability is seen to be consistent with a fracture whose aperture is on the order of 1OOp. The volumes of the fracture elements were chosen to correspond to an aperture of 800pm, however.…”
Section: Horizontal Flow Along a Single Leaky Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Newtonian fluids, Yang et al (2002) developed a mathematical model for the flow of water through a channel impregnated with a polymer gel that is treated as an elastic and deformable porous medium. Kumar et al (1991) investigated the permeability of a rock fracture. The attempts to include porous media in the flows of complex fluids need some new physical parameters besides non-Newtonian fluid parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%