1982
DOI: 10.2307/1885102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent Versus Transitory Tax Effects and the Realization of Capital Gains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, given that individuals have decided to realize gains, the results from the level equation indicate that they realize less capital gains when the capital gains tax rate is high. These results support previous findings from the United States (Auten and Clotfelter 1982;Burman and Randolph 1994;Bogart and Gentry 1995;, suggesting that higher taxes on capital gains create a lock-in effect.…”
Section: Results From Our Primary Specificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, given that individuals have decided to realize gains, the results from the level equation indicate that they realize less capital gains when the capital gains tax rate is high. These results support previous findings from the United States (Auten and Clotfelter 1982;Burman and Randolph 1994;Bogart and Gentry 1995;, suggesting that higher taxes on capital gains create a lock-in effect.…”
Section: Results From Our Primary Specificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…6 Changes in capital gains tax rates thus seem to have a larger effect on the decision whether the individual should realize any capital gains. The estimated tax elasticity with respect to capital gains realizations is smaller than the transitory tax elasticities reported by Auten and Clotfelter (1982), Burman and Randolph (1994) and , but larger than their reported permanent tax elasticities. Our estimated tax elasticity seem to be within the range of elasticities (−0.5 to −0.9) often reported in time-series studies (see e.g., Auten and Cordes 1991) and is slightly higher than the elasticity (−0.65) found by Bogart and Gentry (1995) when studying aggregated state-level realizations in the United States.…”
Section: Results From Our Primary Specificationcontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If individuals face a temporary low income, they might realize accrued capital gains and smooth income to maintain their level of consumption. Apart from the incentive to overcome temporary liquidity constraints by selling capital gains assets, progressive taxation strengthens this tendency (see, for example, Auten and Clotfelter, 1982;Stiglitz, 1983). If the temporary tax rate is significantly lower than the average, permanent tax rate an investor can effectively lower his capital gains tax burden by realizing capital gains in years with liquidity constraints.…”
Section: Capital Gains As Transitory Income Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much empirical research, however, emphasized the potentially large response elasticities to capital gains tax reductions (e.g., Feldstein, Slemrod and Yitzhaki 1980). Subsequent empirical work (including Auten and Clotfelter 1982, Auerbach 1988, and Burman and Randolph 1994 distinguished between shortrun and long-run responses, but thus far has failed to focus on the more sophisticated avoidance strategies detailed in the theoretical literature. This remaining gap between theory and evidence has been due in part to data limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%