2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanent superhydrophilic surface modification in microporous polydimethylsiloxane sponge for multi-functional applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After carbonization, biomass materials form amorphous carbon, which need to be soaked for a long time to show hydrophilicity. In order to make CGA soak quickly in water, combined with the previous study of the surface superhydrophilic method, benzophenone was used as a photoinitiator and UV-grafting of acrylic acid monomer on the surface of CGA was carried out (Figure h). Compared with CGA, UV-grafting with PAA did not bring noticeable change in the weight, size, or pores of SH-CGA. Both the SEM micrographs of CGA and SH-CGA show an interconnected 3D framework of microporous structure with pore sizes varying from 5 to 50 μm, but there is a layer of coating on the surface of SH-CGA (Figure i).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After carbonization, biomass materials form amorphous carbon, which need to be soaked for a long time to show hydrophilicity. In order to make CGA soak quickly in water, combined with the previous study of the surface superhydrophilic method, benzophenone was used as a photoinitiator and UV-grafting of acrylic acid monomer on the surface of CGA was carried out (Figure h). Compared with CGA, UV-grafting with PAA did not bring noticeable change in the weight, size, or pores of SH-CGA. Both the SEM micrographs of CGA and SH-CGA show an interconnected 3D framework of microporous structure with pore sizes varying from 5 to 50 μm, but there is a layer of coating on the surface of SH-CGA (Figure i).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52,53 PDMS is a preferred material for fabricating flexible microfluidic devices due to its unique rheological properties. 54 Additionally, novel surface modification strategies for PDMS enable changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic state 55 to transform surface wettability and remove limitations on fluid flow.…”
Section: Immunoaffinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hydrophobic PDMS faces the serious problem of biofouling from non-specific protein adsorption, bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm development, which causes many undesirable infections and reduces the lifetime of biomedical devices, sometimes even leads to patient deaths [2,[5][6][7]. To solve this problem, PDMS is usually imparted with antibacterial function by tethering polymers on its surface [8][9][10][11][12]. Generally, these polymers can be divided into two categories according to their operating mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%